Teams

LCTA40/BrittonZirneklis/Maybank

STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-28vs LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDIWon 30
W#1 DoublesTara White / Tracey Zirneklis vs Kim Johnson / Carol Noble6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMandy Coleman / Rachel Farmer vs Carrie Clark-Mills / Margaret Riehm6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Copley / Amber McQueen vs Kelley Murray / Mary Moore6-2, 6-1
2025-08-21vs LCTA40/ShiraSoler/MaybankSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Woolum / Tracey Zirneklis vs Kristin Korotney / Maggie Burke5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTara White / Rachel Farmer vs Allison Shira / Barbara Hornig6-3, 6-2
2025-08-07vs LCTA40/Pastorius/AshboroughEastLost 12
L#1 DoublesLora Clarke / Joanne Darkey vs Tammy Karika / Stacy Villarose1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMandy Coleman / Rachel Farmer vs Dana Ramcourt / Jeanette Stuart3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Crary / Tracey Zirneklis vs Renee Carl / Faye MacKall7-6, 7-6
2025-07-31vs LCTA40/Davis/HanahanWon 30
W#1 DoublesBethany Britton / Andrea Woolum vs Stephanie Davis / DEBORAH OBERLE6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Copley / Amber McQueen vs Caroline Stinson / AYNSLEY HADLEY3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Nicholas / Kelsey Barlow vs Erica Radlein / Miranda Holcombe2-2
2025-07-24vs LCTA40/Trost/DICWon 21
W#1 DoublesBethany Britton / Andrea Woolum vs Jana Upshaw / Melody Hall6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLauren Crary / Rachel Farmer vs Julie Trost / Tonya Harley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLora Clarke / Joanne Darkey vs Kim CaraDonna / Kathleen Harrigan6-1, 6-3
2025-07-17vs LCTA40/Armstrong/DotyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMandy Coleman / Rachel Farmer vs Beth Armstrong / Karen Hughes6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTara White / Cara Motowidlo vs Stephanie Spinks / Vera Markovic2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmber McQueen / Michelle Copley vs Jennifer Waggoner / Karyn Kilmartin6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Andrea Woolum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Mandy Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Tara White
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Amber McQueen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Lauren Crary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Lora Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Tracey Zirneklis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Bethany Britton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Patricia Nicholas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Michelle Copley
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Rachel Farmer
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
2.73
Joanne Darkey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.46
Cara Motowidlo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jill Wright
published
Kelsey Barlow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Crary + Tracey Zirneklis3258% games+7.7% vs expected
Bethany Britton + Mandy Coleman8457% games+2.4% vs expected
Bethany Britton + Andrea Woolum8754% games−0.3% vs expected
Bethany Britton + Tracey Zirneklis3353% games−1.6% vs expected
Lauren Crary + Mandy Coleman3454% games−2.7% vs expected
Michelle Copley + Amber McQueen6355% games−5.5% vs expected
Tracey Zirneklis + Patricia Nicholas2345% games−6.9% vs expected
Lauren Crary + Andrea Woolum224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Woolum
31W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Mandy Coleman
80W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Tara White
69W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Amber McQueen
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Lauren Crary
44W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Lora Clarke
25W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Tracey Zirneklis
49W–52L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Bethany Britton
47W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Patricia Nicholas
18W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Michelle Copley
34W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.93
Rachel Farmer
73W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Joanne Darkey
35W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Cara Motowidlo
15W–34L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jill Wright
26W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Barlow
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.