Teams

LCTA40/ShiraSoler/Maybank

STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.29 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-21vs LCTA40/BrittonZirneklis/MaybankSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Korotney / Maggie Burke vs Andrea Woolum / Tracey Zirneklis7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllison Shira / Barbara Hornig vs Tara White / Rachel Farmer3-6, 2-6
2025-08-14vs LCTA40/Trost/DICLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmber Oblinger / Laura Polak vs Lani Staebell / Lora Dennis4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesYuliia McDonald / Elizabeth Stribling vs Nancy Brodsky / Elizabeth Callahan6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Hornig / Dee Dee Joyce vs Jana Upshaw / Rosa J McLaughlin3-6, 2-6
2025-08-07vs LCTA40/BaumannOHara/LTPDIWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Polak / Ellen Munson vs Jill Leahy / Michele Singletary6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Shira / Barbara Hornig vs Leigh Hemingway / April Ginley3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Farrell / Denise Samson vs Diane Rozier / Amy Kimball7-6, 7-5
2025-07-31vs LCTA40/Armstrong/DotyWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Korotney / Dee Dee Joyce vs Karen Hughes / Beth Armstrong6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Soler / Lauren Hamilton vs Heather Levine / Laurie Fletcher6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmber Oblinger / Denise Samson vs Karri King / Lynne Aoyama6-1, 6-1
2025-07-24vs LCTA40/Pastorius/AshboroughEastSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBarbara Hornig / Elizabeth Stribling vs Joanne Nelson / Renee Carl4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Soler / Lauren Hamilton vs Diane Pastorius / Denise Perry6-4, 6-4
2025-07-17vs LCTA40/Evanko/LTPDIWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristin Korotney / Dee Dee Joyce vs Kim Johnson / Bing Sun6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCatherine Farrell / Yuliia McDonald vs Karen SZEGI-Wimpey / Allison Dong1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Shira / Allison Soler vs Mary Moore / Karen Easton6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Kristin Korotney
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Amber Oblinger
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Ellen Munson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Allison Soler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Shanna Thomson
published
3.26
Erica Thibault
published
3.25
Yuliia McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Barbara Hornig
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.01
Maggie Burke
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Elizabeth Stribling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Denise Samson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Laura Polak
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Catherine Farrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Allison Shira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Dee Dee Joyce
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lauren Hamilton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erica Thibault + Ellen Munson4165% games+19.4% vs expected
Shanna Thomson + Allison Soler16361% games+9.4% vs expected
Denise Samson + Catherine Farrell5554% games+8.8% vs expected
Kristin Korotney + Ellen Munson8359% games+4.4% vs expected
Yuliia McDonald + Erica Thibault3351% games+0.8% vs expected
Shanna Thomson + Erica Thibault6748% games+0.1% vs expected
Yuliia McDonald + Ellen Munson2447% games−0.3% vs expected
Yuliia McDonald + Kristin Korotney4352% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Korotney
83W–27L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Amber Oblinger
49W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Ellen Munson
132W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
3.5
Allison Soler
69W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Shanna Thomson
66W–32L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Erica Thibault
52W–28L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Yuliia McDonald
56W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Barbara Hornig
21W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Maggie Burke
29W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Elizabeth Stribling
75W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Denise Samson
50W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Laura Polak
50W–37L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Catherine Farrell
77W–75L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Allison Shira
75W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Dee Dee Joyce
83W–95L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lauren Hamilton
54W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.