Teams

WTC: 3.0 Grand Slams

2026 18&Over Women Day Fall · 3.0 Day

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-25vs YTC: Service With a SmileWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Ginsberg / Jennifer Khan vs Michele DelGiudice / Ali Moss6-1, 6-2
2025-11-18vs Matchpoint: Rockland RacquetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Oldfield / Brittany Nilson vs Naomi Schlesinger / Malki Gartenberg6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Ginsberg / Heather Oldfield vs Michelle Strong / Heather Rhyu3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKelsey Recht / Brittany Nilson vs Megan Kerr / Katie Walbridge1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKatie Paul / Regan Kott vs Catherine Mulhern / Lisa Heinlein7-6, 6-1
2025-10-22vs Westchester CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Glorieux / Annamaria Lamonte vs Allison Brucato / Molly Cahill3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Khan / Katie Paul vs Maureen O'Connor / Danielle Martell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Grant / Sarah Venezia vs Elinor Hoover / RoseMarie Mecane3-6, 2-6
2025-10-14vs TIA 3.0 PurpleWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnnamaria Lamonte / Jennifer Khan vs Stephanie Manheim / Allison Prigozen1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKrysta Holland / Heather Oldfield vs Deirdre Ragusa / Angela Giuffra7-6, 5-2
W#3 DoublesKelsey Recht / Brittany Nilson vs HEATHER COLON / Renee Goldman6-2, 6-3
2025-10-03vs YTC: T's MisfitsWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Ginsberg / Diana Tapper vs Meron Shewarega / Carol Tse4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-16vs Scarsdale Golf ClubWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Ginsberg / Heather Oldfield vs Pamela Montgomery / Alka Khushalani6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.56
Neeladitya Roy
published
3.04
Deborah Ginsberg
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Katie Glorieux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Kelsey Recht
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Krysta Holland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Heather Oldfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Amory Wooden
published 3
Diana Tapper
published 3
2.74
Brittany Nilson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Katie Paul
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Annamaria Lamonte
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.22
Sarah Venezia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jaclyn Feinberg
published
Jennifer Khan
published
Kelly Grant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Regan Kott
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rosemary Hochberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Annamaria Lamonte + Katie Glorieux2358% games+7.3% vs expected
Brittany Nilson + Kelsey Recht7260% games+2.9% vs expected
Rosemary Hochberg + Krysta Holland14559% games+1.5% vs expected
Regan Kott + Kelly Grant4456% games−8.9% vs expected
Diana Tapper + Katie Paul314 matchesnot enough data
Heather Oldfield + Deborah Ginsberg134 matchesnot enough data
Heather Oldfield + Annamaria Lamonte314 matchesnot enough data
Jaclyn Feinberg + Katie Glorieux314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neeladitya Roy
45W–24L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.56
3
Deborah Ginsberg
36W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.04
Katie Glorieux
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Kelsey Recht
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Krysta Holland
40W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Heather Oldfield
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Amory Wooden
30W–19L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Diana Tapper
56W–33L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Brittany Nilson
21W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Katie Paul
25W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Annamaria Lamonte
25W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Sarah Venezia
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Jaclyn Feinberg
23W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Khan
10W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Grant
18W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Regan Kott
24W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Rosemary Hochberg
23W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.