Teams

BRMST NAVY

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-10vs LTA-Q GREENWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Kintzle / Jane Davis vs Jody Reenan / Debra Heiser6-3, 7-5
2023-07-27vs NJ BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Mari / Samantha Sutphin vs Diana Beck / Diana Guettlein6-1, 6-4
2023-07-20vs LTA-Q TEALLost 01
L#2 DoublesDenise Belton / Trudy Brancucci vs Mona Jones / Paula Nelsen4-6, 4-6
2023-07-13vs BRMST YELLOWLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Kintzle / Stacey Mari vs Gail Quinn / Jeanne Peoples6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSamantha Sutphin vs Melissa Clarke1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Lenz / Denise Belton vs Ursula Duran / Laura Tedesco3-6, 2-6
2023-07-06vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesErin Kintzle / Kelly Lenz vs Mary Jo George / Morgan Cox3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStacey Mari vs Nikole Randolph6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-29vs RMTC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSamantha Sutphin vs Chloe Harrah6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJill Long / Denise Belton vs Kristen Foote / Pauline Lahey6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Stacey Mari
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.75
Samantha Sutphin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Erin Kintzle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Jill Long
published
3.52
Denise Belton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Kathy Schmidt
published
3.50
Kelly Lenz
published
2.95
Trudy Brancucci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Kintzle + Denise Belton5554% games+13.4% vs expected
Stacey Mari + Samantha Sutphin10066% games+12.0% vs expected
Erin Kintzle + Stacey Mari8550% games+4.0% vs expected
Kathy Schmidt + Stacey Mari213 matchesnot enough data
Erin Kintzle + Samantha Sutphin123 matchesnot enough data
Denise Belton + Jill Long123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stacey Mari
105W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Samantha Sutphin
83W–57L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Erin Kintzle
58W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Jill Long
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Denise Belton
26W–66L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
Kathy Schmidt
8W–27L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
Kelly Lenz
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Trudy Brancucci
11W–30L career · 1 line in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.