Teams

NJ BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

7 players · average NTRP 3.71 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-10vs RMTC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiana Guettlein / Caryn Moller vs Mary Jensen / Ruth Weinberg6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDiane Waldron vs Yun Wait6-7, 2-6
2023-08-03vs LTA-Q GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Guettlein / Angela Harper vs Jody Reenan / Dennette Stroh1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiane Waldron vs Olimpia Mejia7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Beck / Caryn Moller vs Maureen Hartigan / Catherine Romero4-6, 2-6
2023-07-27vs BRMST NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Beck / Diana Guettlein vs Stacey Mari / Samantha Sutphin1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDiane Waldron vs Kelly Lenz3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBobbi Dorgan / Angela Harper vs Kathy Schmidt / Jill Long7-6, 6-2
2023-07-13vs LTA-Q TEALLost 01
L#1 DoublesDiana Guettlein / Caryn Moller vs Kim Kadlic / Elizabeth Korniczky4-6, 0-6
2023-07-06vs BRMST YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesDiana Beck / Diana Guettlein vs Jeanne Peoples / Gail Quinn7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBobbi Dorgan vs Melissa Clarke2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCaryn Moller / Nancy Ramsey vs Noelle Anthony / Jacy Bowers0-6, 4-6
2023-06-29vs NJ GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiana Guettlein / Caryn Moller vs Darcie Coy / Leigh Hebert5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNancy Ramsey / Diane Waldron vs Leslie Haines / Ann Stafford1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Diana Guettlein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Angela Harper
published 4
3.72
Holly Luebker
published 4
3.27
Diane Waldron
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Caryn Moller
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Diana Beck
published 3.5
3.17
Bobbi Dorgan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Guettlein + Caryn Moller12456% games+2.3% vs expected
Diane Waldron + Bobbi Dorgan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Guettlein
60W–53L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Angela Harper
29W–31L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Holly Luebker
58W–44L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Diane Waldron
39W–75L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Caryn Moller
89W–137L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Diana Beck
12W–19L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Bobbi Dorgan
37W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.