Teams

S OR-STSC-Reid

2024 ADULT 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTHERN OREGON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-18vs TTC-IgarashiWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Ainsworth / Lisa Reid vs Patti Youngren / Donna Keim6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephenie Tucker / Gloria Flager vs Christine Mueller / Donna Jepsen Minyard3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaggie Hudson / Nancy Chamberlain vs Tammy Skubinna / Heidi Igarashi4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-10-29vs ESTC-ThompsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephenie Tucker / Lisa Reid vs Wendy Laing / Paula Cates6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Ainsworth / Khuelien Dretke vs Amanda Jordan / Paula Thompson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesConnie Peters / Kirsten Collins vs Tori Waples / Terry Scherer7-6, 6-1
2023-10-28vs ESTC-LaurieWon 30
W#1 DoublesConnie Peters / Kirsten Collins vs Darci Christian / Radona Peterson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRuth Katter / Nancy Chamberlain vs Susan Burgess / Samantha Robinhold6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaggie Hudson / Khuelien Dretke vs Julie Duvall / Deb Delong6-1, 6-0
2023-10-15vs ACB-FrischkornWon 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Bashey / Gloria Flager vs Eileen Hart / Katy Rocher6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Reid / Jill Ainsworth vs Ann Frischkorn / Susan Glines6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMaggie Hudson / Stephenie Tucker vs Linda White / Michelle McAuliffe6-3, 6-3
2023-10-14vs ACB-Lobbin' LadiesWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Reid / Jill Ainsworth vs Donna Kennish / Lindi Dewolf6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaggie Hudson / Stephenie Tucker vs Ann Francois / Jessica Dunne6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGloria Flager / Nancy Bashey vs Katie Phelps / Jolene Neal6-0, 6-2
2023-09-17vs ATFC-PriceWon 30
W#1 DoublesGloria Flager / Nancy Bashey vs Cheryl Fuller / Kari Gies6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJill Ainsworth / Stephenie Tucker vs Seline Pierson / Patricia Schroeder6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRuth Katter / Nancy Chamberlain vs Peggy Reeder / Jessica Price6-2, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1S OR-STSC-Reid6016212120
2ESTC-Thompson4213512129
3ATFC-Price4281024174
4ACB-Frischkorn339921173
5TTC-Igarashi2471125179
6ESTC-Laurie1561226164
7ACB-Lobbin' Ladies1541430201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Connie Peters
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.40
Maggie Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.38
Gloria Flager
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Stephenie Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Jill Ainsworth
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.10
Lisa Reid
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.66
Kirsten Collins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Khuelien Dretke
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lynn Goeke
published
Nancy Bashey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Chamberlain
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ruth Katter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Reid + Stephenie Tucker6354% games+12.5% vs expected
Gloria Flager + Nancy Bashey9463% games+10.5% vs expected
Maggie Hudson + Stephenie Tucker11850% games−3.3% vs expected
Ruth Katter + Nancy Chamberlain2839% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reid + Jill Ainsworth6072% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Katter + Kirsten Collins1434% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Reid + Gloria Flager3258% gamesnot enough data
Kirsten Collins + Connie Peters5060% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Connie Peters
53W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Maggie Hudson
78W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Gloria Flager
104W–53L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Stephenie Tucker
94W–81L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Jill Ainsworth
51W–21L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lisa Reid
64W–53L career · 8 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Kirsten Collins
21W–29L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
2.66
Khuelien Dretke
8W–11L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynn Goeke
36W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Bashey
42W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Chamberlain
15W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ruth Katter
20W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.