Teams

Collins/Taylordean 3.5 55 Fri

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-05vs Fogleman/Titzer 3.5 55 FriLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Nadler / Libby Wilson vs Toni Lewis / Jody Wood0-6, 2-6
2023-04-21vs Varner/Davis 3.5 55s FriLost 01
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Nadler / Libby Wilson vs Brenda Varner / Margaret Reynolds6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-11vs Cook 3.5 55 FriWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargret Padgett / Katharina Welborn vs Robin Crosier / Stacey Dennehy6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-31vs Fogleman/Titzer 3.5 55 FriLost 01
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Nadler / Margret Padgett vs Mary Jane Tarver / Jody Wood7-6, 4-3
2023-03-17vs Varner/Davis 3.5 55s FriLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargret Padgett / Katharina Welborn vs Betty Kramer / Rhonda Glenn6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-10vs Gossage 3.5 55s Fri AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargret Padgett / Elia Mavronikolas vs Patricia Barman / Kim Taylor6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Vania Robinson
published
2.99
Elia Mavronikolas
published
2.96
Katharina Welborn
published
2.95
Libby Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Margret Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Lauren Collins
published
2.78
Lora Snyder
published
2.72
Joyce Chamblee
published
2.69
Gayle Taylordean
published
2.68
Beth Carter
published 3
2.68
Wendy Ingle
published
2.62
Linda Shuster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lora Snyder + Vania Robinson6257% games+3.1% vs expected
Margret Padgett + Lora Snyder224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Shuster + Elia Mavronikolas314 matchesnot enough data
Katharina Welborn + Gayle Taylordean123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Vania Robinson
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.00
Elia Mavronikolas
27W–40L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Katharina Welborn
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Libby Wilson
56W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
2.95
Margret Padgett
41W–69L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.91
Lauren Collins
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.81
Lora Snyder
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Joyce Chamblee
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Gayle Taylordean
10W–27L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Beth Carter
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Wendy Ingle
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
Linda Shuster
19W–24L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.