Teams

Varner/Davis 3.5 55s Fri

2023 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.21 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-21vs Collins/Taylordean 3.5 55 FriWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenda Varner / Margaret Reynolds vs Evelyn Nadler / Libby Wilson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-01vs Gossage 3.5 55s Fri AMWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrenda Varner / Margaret Reynolds vs Patricia Barman / Pat Gossage6-0, 6-3
2023-03-31Won 10
W#3 DoublesSue Blanchard / Brenda Varner vs Kelly Bankhead / Mary Derrick7-6, 6-1
2023-03-17vs Collins/Taylordean 3.5 55 FriWon 10
W#3 DoublesMargaret Reynolds / Brenda Varner vs Lawrie Beardsley / Gayle Taylordean7-5, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Betty Kramer
published 3.5
3.41
Shelby Rhyne
published
3.38
Margaret Reynolds
published
3.38
Debbie Clancy
published 3.5
3.25
Suzanne Perez
published
3.18
Sue Blanchard
published
3.18
Britt Molitoris
published 3.5
3.03
Sherry Gibson
published
2.92
Rhonda Glenn
published
2.86
Brenda Varner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Donna Davis
published 3
2.80
Faye Halvorsen
published 3
Cathy Taney
published 3
Patty Garner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Perez + Debbie Clancy033 matchesnot enough data
Rhonda Glenn + Sue Blanchard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Betty Kramer
15W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Shelby Rhyne
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Margaret Reynolds
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Debbie Clancy
32W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.38
Suzanne Perez
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Sue Blanchard
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Britt Molitoris
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
Sherry Gibson
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Rhonda Glenn
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Brenda Varner
138W–88L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Donna Davis
11W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Faye Halvorsen
16W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Cathy Taney
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patty Garner
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.