Teams

The Player's Club 3

2024 WINTER A18&O WEEKEND · 2024 Winter A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career

26 players · average NTRP 3.30 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-21vs Racquet Club 3Won 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Fletcher / Laura Benotti vs Beth Kostelnick / Erin Biehl6-4, 7-5
2024-04-14vs The Player's Club 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesWENDY NICHOLS / Amy Fletcher vs Tami Zuchetto / Marsha Bracken6-1, 6-1
2024-03-24vs Olympic 1Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Fletcher / Meghan Wilson vs Amanda Bain / Hallie Sisko7-6, 2-4, 1-0
2024-03-10vs Wickertree 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Fletcher / WENDY NICHOLS vs Dana Sherwood / Cynthia Pawlarczyk6-3, 6-2
2024-03-03vs Scarborough 3Won 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Fletcher / WENDY NICHOLS vs Jennifer Foley / Yan Omen6-2, 5-4
2024-02-11vs Racquet Club 3Won 10
W#1 DoublesWENDY NICHOLS / Amy Fletcher vs Beth Kostelnick / Christy West6-2, 6-4
2024-02-04vs The Player's Club 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesWENDY NICHOLS / Amy Fletcher vs Katie Druhan / Jenny McKenna6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2024 Winter A18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Player's Club 486403069609
2The Player's Club 366322863495

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Heather Beamer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.52
Taree Thuethong
published
3.50
Amy Fletcher
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.50
Lindy Gill
published
3.41
WENDY NICHOLS
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Shey Jin
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.37
Kristin Hummell
published
3.33
Frankie Robinson
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
3.28
Laura Benotti
published
3.27
Anne Houser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anne Bogenrief
published 3.5
3.24
Katie Burgess
published
3.21
Roxsann Wilson
published
3.18
Mary Grace Dennis
published
3.13
Mary Zelasko
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Kimberly Cantrell
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.06
Alison Staloch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Kimberly Minrovic
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.89
Megan Stout
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.85
Cara Callander
published 3
Erika Krausz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Julie Ginnan
published
Mallory Halley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Meghan Wilson
published
Melissa Meyer
published
Nikki Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mallory Halley + Kimberly Cantrell8073% games+19.6% vs expected
Mary Zelasko + Kimberly Cantrell9369% games+17.8% vs expected
Melissa Meyer + Kristin Hummell17367% games+8.9% vs expected
Mary Zelasko + Mallory Halley11464% games+8.4% vs expected
Frankie Robinson + Kimberly Minrovic14560% games+5.7% vs expected
Anne Houser + Taree Thuethong7160% games+5.3% vs expected
WENDY NICHOLS + Amy Fletcher29565% games+5.1% vs expected
Katie Burgess + Anne Houser224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Beamer
53W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Taree Thuethong
110W–52L career · no lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Amy Fletcher
94W–19L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Lindy Gill
37W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
WENDY NICHOLS
68W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.41
Shey Jin
46W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.40
Kristin Hummell
75W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Frankie Robinson
51W–26L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Laura Benotti
31W–22L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Anne Houser
134W–59L career · 1 line in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Anne Bogenrief
20W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Burgess
44W–47L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Roxsann Wilson
44W–27L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Mary Grace Dennis
45W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Mary Zelasko
42W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.13
Kimberly Cantrell
30W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Alison Staloch
31W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.06
Kimberly Minrovic
74W–31L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Megan Stout
41W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Cara Callander
40W–37L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.85
Erika Krausz
37W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Ginnan
59W–48L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mallory Halley
32W–13L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meghan Wilson
40W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Meyer
47W–13L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nikki Miller
9W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.