Teams

CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Wheaton Exner Sat 4 $17

CDTA ESL 18 & Over W · E

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesErik Halperin / Mark Exner vs Rod Wienke / Dave Douglass6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJoshua Luetkehans / Scott Robinson vs Andrew Snyder / Kevin Zimmerman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTed Romaine vs Joe Gasior6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Evans / Claude Cimino vs Andrew Martin / Nick Werth6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesWhitney Brooks vs Aleksandr Kolomiets4-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJoshua Luetkehans / Scott Robinson vs John Hall / Vinod Mahalingam6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDaniel Nielson vs Ricky Hernandez6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClaude Cimino / Erik Halperin vs Deniz Karacay / Hans-Joerg Engler6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesMark Exner vs Tommy Felice4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Smith / Zsolt Juhasz vs John Laurx / Krishna Krupal6-4, 5-4
W#1 DoublesScott Robinson / Joshua Luetkehans vs Giann Meletto / Joseph Shmigelsky6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDaniel Nielson vs Adrien Sedillot6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWhitney Brooks / Anders Singdahlsen vs Arjun Murthy / Dennis Kontorovich2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTed Romaine vs Manuel Brito Doerr4-6, 2-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesClaude Cimino / Mark Exner vs John Mysz / Oliver Gallego6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJoshua Luetkehans / Scott Robinson vs Michael Kazmirak / Andrew Mabadi7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDaniel Nielson vs Matthew Pruyn6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesClaude Cimino / Glenn Evans vs David Polmer / Justin Hetler3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNick Rost vs David Shekman4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesMark Exner vs Eric H Lo6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M S Barrington Douglass Sun 7 $2052221332280
2CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Naperville Schmidt Sat 4 $2043211433288
3CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $2043181739315
4CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $2543171841319
5CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Five Seasons Radonjic Sat 4 $2034171840324
6CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Tam Needler Sun 7 $2034152043328
7CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M North Shore Sternfield Sat 5 $234132248316
8CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Wheaton Exner Sat 4 $1725171837304
9(DROPPED) CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Glenbrook Tysl Sun 5 $25000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.42
Zsolt Juhasz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.41
Joshua Luetkehans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Ted Romaine
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Anders Singdahlsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Claude Cimino
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Erik Halperin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Mark Exner
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.00
Glenn Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Daniel Nielson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nick Rost
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Whitney Brooks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claude Cimino + Joshua Luetkehans8362% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Mark Exner5158% gamesnot enough data
Erik Halperin + Mark Exner4256% gamesnot enough data
Claude Cimino + Mark Exner2341% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Zsolt Juhasz4160% gamesnot enough data
Whitney Brooks + Erik Halperin2347% gamesnot enough data
Glenn Evans + Anders Singdahlsen3253% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Erik Halperin134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zsolt Juhasz
50W–15L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%72%28%
4.42
Joshua Luetkehans
56W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
Ted Romaine
41W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Anders Singdahlsen
6W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Claude Cimino
43W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Erik Halperin
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
Mark Exner
74W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Glenn Evans
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
4.00
Daniel Nielson
19W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nick Rost
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Whitney Brooks
15W–25L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.