Teams

CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $25

CDTA ESL 18 & Over W · E

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesDonald Brown / Justin Hetler vs Andrew Wolfberg / Kevin Zimmerman5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNicholas Silacci / Greg Lee vs Matthew Smucker / Nick Werth3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesIan Barr / David Polmer vs David Burciaga / William Guthrie3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2021-11-13Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Polmer / Ian Barr vs Jan Delariman / John Li6-4, 6-4
W#1 DoublesJacob Quigley / Justin Hetler vs Han Han / Brad Smith3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNicholas Silacci vs Keenan Lee7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCole Heule / Jeffrey Bartow vs Mike Stroka / Nick Radonjic7-6, 3-3, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMark Kappelman / David Polmer vs Simon Kudernatsch / Deniz Karacay6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Pruyn vs Michael Hess4-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Perez Rivas / Justin Hetler vs Jonathon Schmidt / Nhan Tran7-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesJoseph Lyden / Ian Barr vs John Laurx / Jay Goldner3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMatthew Pruyn vs Daniel Nielson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Polmer / Justin Hetler vs Claude Cimino / Glenn Evans6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDonald Brown / Joseph Lyden vs Mark Wynsma / Abdulhamid Hussein7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCole Heule vs Leopoldo Gutierrez2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMark Kappelman / David Polmer vs Arjun Murthy / Derrick Almassy6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonald Brown / Joseph Lyden vs Manuel Brito Doerr / William Steinman6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M S Barrington Douglass Sun 7 $2052221332280
2CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Naperville Schmidt Sat 4 $2043211433288
3CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Tam Shmigelsky Sun 7 $2043181739315
4CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M MT Chi Brown Sat 3 $2543171841319
5CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Five Seasons Radonjic Sat 4 $2034171840324
6CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Tam Needler Sun 7 $2034152043328
7CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M North Shore Sternfield Sat 5 $234132248316
8CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Wheaton Exner Sat 4 $1725171837304
9(DROPPED) CDTA E 18&O W/E 4.5M Glenbrook Tysl Sun 5 $25000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Cole Heule
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
David Polmer
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.22
Will Weyenberg
published
4.16
Ian Barr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Nicholas Silacci
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
David Shekman
published 4.5
4.05
Justin Hetler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.31
Joseph Lyden
published 3.5
Donald Brown
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jeffrey Bartow
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Mark Kappelman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Matthew Pruyn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Hetler + Ian Barr2648% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Lyden + Ian Barr2450% gamesnot enough data
David Polmer + Justin Hetler2444% gamesnot enough data
David Polmer + Ian Barr3350% gamesnot enough data
Justin Hetler + Cole Heule2448% gamesnot enough data
David Polmer + Mark Kappelman3252% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Lyden + Donald Brown404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cole Heule
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
David Polmer
19W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Will Weyenberg
22W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
4.5
Ian Barr
49W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
4.16
Nicholas Silacci
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
David Shekman
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.10
Justin Hetler
54W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
4.05
3.5
Joseph Lyden
66W–115L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Donald Brown
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeffrey Bartow
16W–10L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Kappelman
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Pruyn
7W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.