Teams

MLong-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-24vs BShane-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Hoots / Celina Morice vs Meghan Rider / Laura Carlson6-1, 6-1
2025-04-19vs JRoss-ENOLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrenda Li / Connie Kim vs Katherine Leib / Justyne Ross1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesCorinne Haywood vs Carrie Guthrie0-6, 4-6
2025-03-27vs KGreen-ENOWon 21
L#1 DoublesOxana Gorbacheva / Corinne Haywood vs Hannah Boghosian / Keshia Green7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAmy Hoots vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTia Vierling / Brenda Li vs Kristin Cooley / Lisa Hsu7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2025-03-23vs TLangino-SVCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Elizabeth McNamara vs Tiffany Langino / Christine Sudzina Schut6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCelina Morice / Melinda Vigolo vs Erika Linnander / Melissa Coward6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrenda Li / Connie Kim vs Anne Stephens / Allison Stewart-Smull6-1, 6-1
2025-03-13vs CBaddour-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Elizabeth McNamara vs Carey Baddour / Crissy Haley2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesCelina Morice vs Sarah Shelby0-5
W#3 DoublesConnie Kim / Brenda Li vs Betsey Duthe / Frances Wilson6-4, 7-6
2025-03-06vs MPaul-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Melinda Vigolo vs Madison Paul / Karen Scherr6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Elizabeth McNamara vs Katie Evans / Elizabeth Harvie7-6, 6-2
2025-02-27vs KNorris-ENOSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Megan Chiles6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Chin / Corinne Haywood vs Wendy Lindberg / Lisa Montague0-6, 1-6
2025-02-20vs DLape-ENOSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCelina Morice / Tia Vierling vs Ximena Ordonez-Acevedo / Amber Cagle2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesOxana Gorbacheva vs Nancy Pack2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCorinne Haywood / Elizabeth McNamara vs Lori Jensen / Kylie Griep7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKim Peters vs Donna Misa6-2, 6-1
2025-02-13vs SEasterling-HVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesOxana Gorbacheva / Corinne Haywood vs Paulina Salerno / Samantha Curtis6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Hoots vs Alana Argersinger6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBrenda Li / Connie Kim vs Madeline Liddicoat / Kelsey Kearney4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Amy Hoots
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.89
Oxana Gorbacheva
usually #2 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.75
Kim Peters
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.72
Elizabeth McNamara
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 13% · published 4
3.53
Brenda Li
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.49
Corinne Haywood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Celina Morice
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Melinda Vigolo
published
3.31
Berna Tareen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.87
Sheza Healey
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.82
Mary T Long
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tia Vierling
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Hoots
107W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
4.13
Oxana Gorbacheva
26W–10L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
Kim Peters
23W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Elizabeth McNamara
30W–17L career · 8 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Brenda Li
278W–108L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Corinne Haywood
120W–65L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Celina Morice
93W–79L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.35
Melinda Vigolo
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Berna Tareen
9W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Sheza Healey
13W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
Tia Vierling
0W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.