← Search

Kim Peters

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 125W–60L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history185 matches
W
2026-10-10 · Je.Anderson18C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa House
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-10-03 · #3 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
3-4
L
2026-10-03 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-10-02 · #1 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-10-02 · #2 Singles · 4.0 championship
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-0
L
2026-09-30 · St.Luther40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Luther
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-09-24 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Alison Kalinowski
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-16 · St.Luther40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Korri Styers
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-09-12 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lily Li
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-09-02 · St.Luther40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fran Ange
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-29 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melissa House
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · St.Luther40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Luther
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
90%
9W–1L · 71.2% of games
3.0
84.2%
16W–3L · 67% of games
3.5
77.8%
49W–14L · 67.4% of games
4.0
60.8%
31W–20L · 55.5% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.4% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 69.3% of games
7.5
40%
8W–12L · 48.7% of games
3.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.5% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 31.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 44% of the time
#1 Singles
44%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#2 Singles
13%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
17 matches
#3 Singles
6%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer