← Search

Alison Kalinowski

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 148W–81L · seasons 2021–2026

USTA moved this player up a level mid-season in 2022. A published rating does not change until the end of the year, so the level shown above can be behind what USTA has already decided.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-10-16 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Terri Bartucca championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-10-08 · Sh.Littleton40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Teasdale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-10-07 · Sh.Littleton40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Angela Teasdale
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-09-24 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kim Peters
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-24 · Al.Kalinowski40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with CAROLINE FLAMANT
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · Sh.Littleton40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Chapman-Wilson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Al.Kalinowski40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erin Hemminger
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · Je.Anderson18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Anderson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-08-13 · Al.Kalinowski40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lynnsy Summitt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-12 · Sh.Littleton40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Holly Atkinson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Je.Anderson18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caroline Tanner
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-01 · Je.Anderson18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa House
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
70%
28W–12L · 60.7% of games
3.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 64.8% of games
3.5
59%
49W–34L · 55.8% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.4% of games
5.5
20%
1W–4L · 37% of games
6.5
75.9%
22W–7L · 57.6% of games
7.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 53.5% of games
3.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 55.1% of games
6.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 60% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
87 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
40 matches
#1 Singles
10%
23 matches
#2 Singles
9%
20 matches
#3 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer