← Search

Amber Cagle

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
324 matches · 219W–105L · seasons 2016–2026
Match history324 matches
L
2026-10-08 · TPerrone-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daphne Poulk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-10-07 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Meike Schacht
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-02 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deanna Lape
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-26 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daphne Poulk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · TPerrone-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daphne Poulk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-19 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Jensen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daphne Poulk
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Sa.Wood40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Sauer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · KPollak-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
3-4
L
2026-06-01 · KPollak-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-12 · Sa.Wood40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daphne Poulk
loading the estimate
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-11 · Sa.Wood18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daphne Poulk
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams66 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
78.1%
25W–7L · 61.2% of games
3.5
78.6%
55W–15L · 65.5% of games
4.0
54.1%
46W–39L · 50.8% of games
6.5
80.8%
21W–5L · 59.6% of games
7.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 53.3% of games
8.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 62.9% of games
7.0mixed
69.7%
23W–10L · 57.9% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 25% of the time
#1 Doubles
25%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
61 matches
#2 Singles
16%
51 matches
#1 Singles
12%
40 matches
Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal