Search

Amber Cagle

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
316 matches · 216W–100L · seasons 20192026

Captains: add Amber Cagle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history316 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Sa.Wood40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deanna Lape
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-26 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daphne Poulk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-20 · TPerrone-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daphne Poulk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Emily Johnson / Ann Skvarcius
2026-08-19 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lori Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · Sa.Wood40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daphne Poulk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Sa.Wood40C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Diane Sauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · KPollak-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
L
2026-06-01 · KPollak-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-12 · Sa.Wood40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daphne Poulk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Julie Kelly / Kathryn Lawn
2026-05-11 · Sa.Wood18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daphne Poulk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-11 · KPollak-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-05 · Sa.Wood40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Loaiza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
84%
21W–4L · 65.2% of games
3.5
81.2%
52W–12L · 66.5% of games
4.0
54.1%
46W–39L · 50.8% of games
6.5
84%
21W–4L · 60.7% of games
7.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 53.4% of games
8.5
50%
5W–5L · 46.2% of games
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 66.3% of games
7.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal