Teams

Sunset Hills

2026 USTA Adult 40 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Men 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-04-11vs V-LLW Wood Ranch Hitmen- FacianaLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Thompson / Eric Dyer vs Mark Lipsky / Kristopher Sherrill4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPat Johnson / Francois Odienne vs Tyler Jensen / Cory Rodrigues6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPaul Lorentzen / Matt Currey vs Sachin Agrahar / Shimon Nofar2-6, 6-7
2026-03-28vs Dream TeamWon 31
W#1 DoublesDarryl Heller / Pat Johnson vs Andrew Smith / Mike Seay6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJames Wallman vs Yung Yi0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSean Reardon / David Thompson vs Chris Mattock / Winston Deardorff7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFrancois Odienne / Mike Bernstein vs Walter Burstein / Jon Boring4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Eric Dyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Pat Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Sid Bhargava
published
3.74
Darryl Heller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Mike Bernstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Richard Park
published
3.60
Todd Silver
published
3.56
Francois Odienne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Paul Lorentzen
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.42
James Wallman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.00
Tanya Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Matt Currey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Patrick Um
published
Sean Reardon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tony Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darryl Heller + Pat Johnson3354% gamesnot enough data
Sid Bhargava + Pat Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eric Dyer
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Pat Johnson
18W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Sid Bhargava
10W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Darryl Heller
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Mike Bernstein
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Richard Park
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Todd Silver
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Francois Odienne
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Paul Lorentzen
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.52
James Wallman
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Tanya Thompson
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Matt Currey
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Um
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sean Reardon
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tony Green
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.