Teams

Pelican Marsh - Prentice

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-14vs Heritage Bay - L. KeillorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRosie Renfro / Barclay Marcell vs Debra Bowenkamp / Annette Brennan7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBiqin Teng / Leigh Traut vs Barbara Fortunato / Carole Flegel1-6, 3-6
2022-03-14vs Treviso bay - B.WoodWon 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Taylor / Biqin Teng vs Kathy Hamilton / Michele Bongiorno6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-14vs Island Country Club -NugentSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHelena Roeper / Biqin Teng vs Missy Kuklenski / Elizabeth Burton5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFiona Prentice / Rosie Renfro vs Julie Maly / Ann Heinauer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-07vs Shadow Wood CC - SmithSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBiqin Teng / Carolyn Benson vs Priscilla Harrington / Paulette Simpson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRosie Renfro / Helena Roeper vs Wendy Kennedy / Pam Schoemer6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-01-31Won 10
W#2 DoublesRosie Renfro / Fiona Prentice vs Emily Martin / Linda Olson6-4, 6-2
2022-01-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesHelena Roeper / Rosie Renfro vs Lisa Jess / Debra Olsen7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-01-17vs Naples Grande - J. FrankLost 01
L#2 DoublesBiqin Teng / Leigh Traut vs Gail Kennedy / Karen Morand4-6, 3-6
2022-01-10vs Esplanade- SteuererWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosie Renfro / Deborah Sawin vs Lorraine Steuerer / Linda Ditta7-5, 6-1
2022-01-03vs Pelican Landing - MooneyLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeigh Traut / Biqin Teng vs Jennifer Seefeld / Jodi Petkovich2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRosie Renfro / Cindy Leiding vs Ellen Davis / Marjie Killeen6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Barclay Marcell
published 4
3.89
Helena Roeper
published 4
3.85
Fiona Prentice
published 4
3.62
Biqin Teng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Kimberly Taylor
published
Linda Michaux
published
Rosie Renfro
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barclay Marcell + Helena Roeper5165% games+12.6% vs expected
Linda Michaux + Biqin Teng5258% gamesnot enough data
Rosie Renfro + Biqin Teng224 matchesnot enough data
Rosie Renfro + Kimberly Taylor213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barclay Marcell
28W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Helena Roeper
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Fiona Prentice
33W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Biqin Teng
68W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
Kimberly Taylor
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Michaux
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosie Renfro
36W–38L career · 14 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.