Teams

Naples Grande - J. Frank

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-02-28vs Heritage Bay - L. KeillorWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Morand / Gail Kennedy vs Annette Brennan / Mary Stuart Snyder6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMary Strohmaier / Meg Perez vs Kathleen Farmer / Mercedes Baumann6-1, 6-2
2022-02-21vs Esplanade- SteuererSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKaren Morand / Gail Kennedy vs Alice Meyer / Tina Albright6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMeg Perez / Mary Strohmaier vs Lorraine Steuerer / Linda Ditta6-1, 6-2
2022-02-14vs Grey Hawk - J. HulbertWon 10
W#3 DoublesJoanne Belcastro / Valerie Ghoussaini vs Jill Hulbert / Dina Viteretti6-3, 6-3
2022-01-31vs Cambier - L. GustLost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Manning / Joanne Belcastro vs Patricia Wille / Kerry Doyle6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2022-01-24vs Naples Bay Resort - LevineSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMeg Perez / Mary Strohmaier vs Ricki Levine / Peggy Kasilowski6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoanne Belcastro / Ann Manning vs Marguerite Bromley / Sherry Crockett6-1, 6-3
2022-01-17vs Pelican Marsh - PrenticeSplit 11
W#2 DoublesGail Kennedy / Karen Morand vs Biqin Teng / Leigh Traut6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAnn Manning / Karen McGuire vs Helena Roeper / Deborah Sawin5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Morand / Gail Kennedy vs Brita Swanson / Carrie Masci7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-03vs Grey OaksWon 10
W#3 DoublesGail Kennedy / Karen Morand vs Lorrie Lavery / Margaret Werchek6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Karen Morand
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
Ann Manning
published 4
Jackie Sawicki
published 4
3.67
Lisa Vivori
published 4
3.62
Meg Perez
published
3.57
Ginger Ferraez
published 4
3.16
Gail Kennedy
published 3.5
Eve Perni
published
Joanne Belcastro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Karen McGuire
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Strohmaier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Renee Desrosiers
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Morand
72W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Ann Manning
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Jackie Sawicki
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Lisa Vivori
82W–122L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Meg Perez
90W–92L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Ginger Ferraez
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Gail Kennedy
50W–53L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Eve Perni
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joanne Belcastro
55W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen McGuire
68W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mary Strohmaier
21W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Desrosiers
18W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.