Teams

Glad to be alive

2026 65 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-09-09vs Buds Potential-65Won 20
W#1 DoublesBuckner Harris / Karl Baughman vs Victor Allen / Bruce Goslovich7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMike Buckingham / Jeffrey Henken vs Jay Larsen / Jake Putnam6-1, 6-1
2026-09-02vs Buds Potential-65Won 21
L#1 DoublesKarl Baughman / Jeffrey Henken vs Victor Allen / Bruce Goslovich4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBuckner Harris / Robert Welch vs David Umberger / Joaquin Wong6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPhil Ellis / Kimbell Gourley vs Jake Putnam / Jay Larsen6-0, 6-3
2026-08-24vs Buds Potential-65Won 30
W#1 DoublesKarl Baughman / Jeff Seals vs Joaquin Wong / David Umberger6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRobert Welch / Buckner Harris vs Victor Allen / Joseph Brennan6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKimbell Gourley / Phil Ellis vs Bruce Goslovich / Jake Putnam6-1, 6-2
2026-08-17vs Buds Potential-65Won 30
W#1 DoublesMike Buckingham / Jeff Seals vs Victor Allen / Russell Moorhead6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Trask / Jeffrey Henken vs Jake Putnam / Jay Larsen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPhil Ellis / Kimbell Gourley vs David Umberger / Joaquin Wong6-3, 6-0
2026-08-05vs Buds Potential-65Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDaniel Friend / Robert Rippner vs Bruce Goslovich / Jake Putnam6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-08-03vs Buds Potential-65Won 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Friend / Robert Rippner vs Jake Putnam / Bruce Goslovich6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Glad to be alive3081344
2Buds Potential-65031817103

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kimbell Gourley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.11
Mike Buckingham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.92
Daniel Friend
published 4
3.88
Buckner Harris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.87
Jeff Seals
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Jeffrey Trask
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Karl Baughman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Robert Welch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Henken
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Phil Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Robert Rippner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Phil Ellis + Kimbell Gourley8076% games+12.5% vs expected
Buckner Harris + Karl Baughman25857% games+5.1% vs expected
Jeff Seals + Karl Baughman14657% games+1.1% vs expected
Jeffrey Henken + Karl Baughman7258% games−0.8% vs expected
Jeffrey Henken + Jeffrey Trask22955% games−4.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Henken + Buckner Harris10659% games−6.5% vs expected
Phil Ellis + Robert Welch12854% gamesnot enough data
Robert Welch + Daniel Friend9259% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kimbell Gourley
36W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
4.29
4
Mike Buckingham
137W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
4.11
4
Daniel Friend
53W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Buckner Harris
107W–68L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Jeff Seals
93W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Jeffrey Trask
45W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Karl Baughman
180W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Robert Welch
61W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Jeffrey Henken
104W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Phil Ellis
65W–31L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.60
Robert Rippner
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.