Teams

IE-Andulka-Pereya

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Women 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-02vs IE-TCC-DanielsWon 21
W#1 DoublesRoz Vinson / Ilse Ungeheuer vs Anne Neal / Charlotte Pereira Reisch7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRene Sarver / Elizabeth Curtiss vs Jill Mastroluca / Kerri Munson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlisa Knutson / Laura Hibbard vs Maria Sambito / Eva Revesz5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-18vs IE-Redlands-RydellWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Curtiss / Dorothy Geiger vs Natalie Nofsinger / Gayle Vanderlinden2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJane Magro / Laura Hibbard vs Donna Crow / Denise Stewart6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRene Sarver / Tami Schulte vs Rei Spickelmier / Elizabeth Cole4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-11vs IE-Redlands-RydellWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Brun / Tami Schulte vs Gayle Vanderlinden / Jean Kielhold6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDorothy Geiger / Laura Hibbard vs Donna Crow / Lisa Contreras6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Jo Russo-Pereyra vs Cesaria Vazquez / Natalie Nofsinger6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-28vs IE-TCC-DanielsLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Curtiss / Laura Hibbard vs Maria Sambito / Anne Neal6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTami Schulte / Heidi Brun vs Lisa Hawkins / Eva Revesz7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJo Russo-Pereyra / Roz Vinson vs Mary Herbers Eme / Patricia Ash3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-27vs IE-LLW-CCCC-KayLost 12
L#1 DoublesRoz Vinson / Jane Magro vs Janet Giles / Theresa Winterburn3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTami Schulte / Heidi Brun vs Cilla Horta / Jamie Evans4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDorothy Geiger / Elizabeth Curtiss vs Sesilie Kay / Susan Swieca6-4, 6-2
2026-06-14vs IE-LLW-CCCC-KayWon 30
W#1 DoublesJane Magro / Roz Vinson vs Janet Giles / Jamie Evans6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Brun / Laura Hibbard vs Karen Morse / Jacqueline Bobo6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRene Sarver / Elizabeth Curtiss vs Sesilie Kay / Julie Perkins6-4, 6-4
2026-05-30vs IE-Andulka-PalmerWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Hibbard / Roz Vinson vs Trish Evans / Stephanie Ells7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Tami Schulte vs Kam Jara / Faith Yeaton6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJo Russo-Pereyra / Alisa Knutson vs Sheila Palmer / Jordana Ridland5-7, 6-7
2026-05-02vs IE-Andulka-PalmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Curtiss / Dorothy Geiger vs Trish Evans / Stephanie Ells7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesIlse Ungeheuer / Jane Magro vs Patricia McNulty / Sheila Palmer7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRene Sarver / Alisa Knutson vs Faith Yeaton / Kam Jara6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Laura Hibbard
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.42
Ilse Ungeheuer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Jane Magro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Elizabeth Curtiss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Heidi Brun
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Roz Vinson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Alisa Knutson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Karen Ewing
published
3.10
Rene Sarver
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.07
Dorothy Geiger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Jo Russo-Pereyra
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Sheila Malone
published
Tami Schulte
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Magro + Ilse Ungeheuer12655% games+8.3% vs expected
Laura Hibbard + Heidi Brun9457% games+0.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Curtiss + Dorothy Geiger341657% games−1.4% vs expected
Jane Magro + Elizabeth Curtiss3457% gamesnot enough data
Jane Magro + Roz Vinson4355% gamesnot enough data
Jo Russo-Pereyra + Roz Vinson3453% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Curtiss + Roz Vinson4349% gamesnot enough data
Ilse Ungeheuer + Roz Vinson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Laura Hibbard
126W–44L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Ilse Ungeheuer
89W–80L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Jane Magro
73W–54L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Elizabeth Curtiss
84W–52L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Heidi Brun
139W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Roz Vinson
74W–71L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Alisa Knutson
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.14
Karen Ewing
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
Rene Sarver
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dorothy Geiger
58W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3
Jo Russo-Pereyra
79W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Sheila Malone
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.63
Tami Schulte
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.