Teams

IE-Redlands-Rydell

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over - IE · IE Women 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.28 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-19vs IE-LLW-CCCC-KayLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Gayle Vanderlinden vs Cilla Horta / Kelly Bollmann3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJean Kielhold / Terri Burchinal vs Theresa Winterburn / Janet Giles2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesRei Spickelmier / Donna Crow vs Nanette Pratini / Susan Swieca6-3, 6-3
2026-07-18vs IE-Andulka-PereyaLost 12
W#1 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Gayle Vanderlinden vs Elizabeth Curtiss / Dorothy Geiger6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDonna Crow / Denise Stewart vs Jane Magro / Laura Hibbard2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRei Spickelmier / Elizabeth Cole vs Rene Sarver / Tami Schulte6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-12vs IE-TCC-DanielsWon 21
W#1 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Gayle Vanderlinden vs Kerri Munson / Jill Mastroluca6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Kielhold / Terrie Garcia vs Maria Sambito / Charlotte Pereira Reisch6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRei Spickelmier / Elizabeth Rydall vs Jennifer Daniels / Mary Herbers Eme3-6, 4-6
2026-07-11vs IE-Andulka-PereyaLost 12
L#1 DoublesGayle Vanderlinden / Jean Kielhold vs Heidi Brun / Tami Schulte7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Crow / Lisa Contreras vs Dorothy Geiger / Laura Hibbard4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesCesaria Vazquez / Natalie Nofsinger vs Ilse Ungeheuer / Jo Russo-Pereyra4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-05vs IE-LLW-CCCC-KayLost 12
L#1 DoublesCesaria Vazquez / Terrie Garcia vs Janet Giles / Theresa Winterburn6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDenise Stewart / Donna Crow vs Cilla Horta / Nanette Pratini7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGayle Vanderlinden / Natalie Nofsinger vs Julie Perkins / Sesilie Kay3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-20vs IE-Andulka-PalmerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJean Kielhold / Terri Burchinal vs Stephanie Ells / Sheila Palmer6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Cesaria Vazquez vs Trish Evans / Joyce Zhu2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesRei Spickelmier / Gayle Vanderlinden vs Kam Jara / Mary Anderson6-1, 6-0
2026-06-14vs IE-TCC-DanielsLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerrie Garcia / Denise Stewart vs Marie Honda / Jennifer Daniels6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Rydall / Rei Spickelmier vs Maria Sambito / Mary Herbers Eme3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusane Hong / Elizabeth Cole vs Laura Montenegro / Eva Revesz4-6, 5-7
2026-05-16vs IE-Andulka-PalmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatalie Nofsinger / Gayle Vanderlinden vs Sheila Palmer / Stephanie Ells6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTerri Burchinal / Jean Kielhold vs Kam Jara / Patricia McNulty6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Rydall / Rei Spickelmier vs Amy Croushore / Jordana Ridland6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Terrie Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Jean Kielhold
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Natalie Nofsinger
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.19
Gayle Vanderlinden
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Cesaria Vazquez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Terri Burchinal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Donna Crow
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Rei Spickelmier
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.94
Elizabeth Rydall
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.92
Elizabeth Cole
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Lisa Contreras
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susane Hong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Rydall + Rei Spickelmier4353% games+2.5% vs expected
Natalie Nofsinger + Gayle Vanderlinden4153% games+1.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Rydall + Terri Burchinal6261% gamesnot enough data
Terri Burchinal + Jean Kielhold3352% gamesnot enough data
Cesaria Vazquez + Natalie Nofsinger123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terrie Garcia
5W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Jean Kielhold
86W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Natalie Nofsinger
32W–48L career · type A · 7 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Gayle Vanderlinden
6W–6L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Cesaria Vazquez
45W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Terri Burchinal
55W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Donna Crow
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Rei Spickelmier
47W–29L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Elizabeth Rydall
105W–82L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Elizabeth Cole
9W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Lisa Contreras
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.92
Susane Hong
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.