Teams

Bradford - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-02-15vs Crooke - SHLSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRenee Bradford / Glenn Shane vs Bradley Price / Ann Scott3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Timothy Sumrall vs Shaner Garner Crooke / Jonathan Garcia6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-01vs Crooke - SHLLost 12
W#1 DoublesWilliam Morris / Bonita Witkin vs Anna Kreis / Karlo Rivera7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Glenn Shane vs Jonathan Garcia / Claudia Simmons2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Nitterauer / Eric Stewart vs Jami Steinmetz / Ken McCurdy3-6, 2-6
2022-01-18vs Marino - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesBonita Witkin / Brad Bradford vs Jena Wise / Zachary Schweigert6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Bradford / Brett Worley vs Tracey Mcclurd / Donald Russell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-11vs Miller - RS ClayLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Morris / Bonita Witkin vs Christopher Brown / Erin Rhone7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGlenn Shane / Renee Bradford vs Carl Miller / Ashle Tran3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Brad Bradford
published 4.5
4.17
Lauren Haack
published
3.97
Susan Nitterauer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Renee Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.74
Michael Yager
published
3.65
Brett Worley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Whitney Sumrall
published
3.62
Bonita Witkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.55
Glenn Shane
published 4
3.36
Eric Stewart
published 3.5
3.13
Timothy Sumrall
published
William Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Bradford + Brett Worley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brad Bradford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
Susan Nitterauer
149W–130L career · 2 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
Renee Bradford
134W–163L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Michael Yager
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Brett Worley
94W–54L career · 1 line in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Whitney Sumrall
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Bonita Witkin
55W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Glenn Shane
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Eric Stewart
19W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Timothy Sumrall
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
William Morris
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.