Teams

Stonebridge Ranch/Delbridge-Killinger W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

17 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-20Won 20
W#1 SinglesLu Phillips vs Natalia Jimenez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Libby / Morgan Kaplan vs Alexandra Villamarin / Jennifer Craft7-5, 6-2
2026-06-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLu Phillips vs Sheridan Lang0-6, 1-6
2026-05-16vs Wilkerson-Lamarque/Nguyen W3.5SLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicole Libby / Lu Phillips vs Hsiao-Lan Wilson / Ella Li4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMorgan Kaplan / Robin Bates vs Hsiao-Wen Chang / Lory Martin6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-02vs Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5SWon 20
W#1 SinglesLu Phillips vs Blair Ward6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCindy Graham / Morgan Kaplan vs Julia Dang / Michele Lesslie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Amy Cox
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Nicole Libby
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Aubrey Kennedy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.18
Corrine Gregor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Lea Ellsworth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Dawn Rochelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Martinson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.11
Robin Bates
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.09
Cindy Graham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Lu Phillips
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.05
Annette Delbridge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.90
Heather Jordan
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
2.90
Michelle Sowards
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Singles 19% · published
2.73
Natalia Abramyan
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Kelly Killinger
published
Lindsey Hudgins
usually #1 Singles 90%, also #2 Singles 10% · published
Morgan Kaplan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aubrey Kennedy + Kelly Killinger4265% games+19.2% vs expected
Cindy Graham + Carrie Martinson5258% games+10.6% vs expected
Cindy Graham + Lea Ellsworth4257% games+6.2% vs expected
Robin Bates + Carrie Martinson3451% games−2.6% vs expected
Michelle Sowards + Morgan Kaplan51147% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Graham + Kelly Killinger9075% gamesnot enough data
Dawn Rochelle + Nicole Libby4152% gamesnot enough data
Carrie Martinson + Aubrey Kennedy3261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Cox
16W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.62
Nicole Libby
19W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Aubrey Kennedy
43W–25L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Corrine Gregor
16W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Lea Ellsworth
20W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Dawn Rochelle
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Carrie Martinson
29W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Robin Bates
19W–22L career · 9 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Cindy Graham
34W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
Lu Phillips
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.09
3
Annette Delbridge
11W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Heather Jordan
31W–27L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.90
Michelle Sowards
40W–47L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
2.90
Natalia Abramyan
15W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Kelly Killinger
31W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Hudgins
22W–7L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Morgan Kaplan
8W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.