Teams

Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

16 players · average NTRP 3.39 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20vs Wilkerson-Lamarque/Nguyen W3.5SSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAmber Ostrander / Casey Ellis vs Hsiao-Lan Wilson / Ella Li6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Nelson / Blair Ward vs Hanh Nguyen / Dawn Covin6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Parsons vs Jenna Dinh6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKathy Engelbrecht / Lynn Johnson vs Lily Treacy / Kathie Norris6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-06-13Won 31
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Parsons vs Julia Cisneros6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJana Chester / Amber Ostrander vs Jacquelyn Lewis / Lisa Holdorf6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJulia Dang vs Christina Norrie6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKathy Engelbrecht / Jackie Nelson vs Lisken Kastalanych / Mendy Hatley2-6, 5-7
2026-05-30vs Cooper FC/Jimenez W3.5SWon 20
W#2 DoublesJana Chester / Amber Ostrander vs Shanna Claytor / Natalie Carey6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulia Dang / Lynn Johnson vs Paloma Leonato / Jennifer Craft7-6, 6-3
2026-05-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesHope Heldmar / Amber Ostrander vs Gretchen Allen / Meghan Rosener7-6, 7-5
2026-05-09Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCasey Ellis / Amy Loehr vs Susie Taub / Merilee Biancardi7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJackie Nelson / Jana Chester vs Amy Cox / Aubrey Kennedy1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCasey Ellis / Amy Loehr vs Corrine Gregor / Annette Delbridge4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulia Dang / Michele Lesslie vs Cindy Graham / Morgan Kaplan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · S W. Saturday League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Greenhill/Ericson-Chris W3.5S6128721236
2Oak Creek/Grubstein W3.5S61251025251
3Bob DayTC/Sisk-Griffin W3.5S61221330290
4Wilkerson-Lamarque/Nguyen W3.5S5122824233
5Chandlers Landing/Campbell W3.5S43201535294
6Lakes at Castle Hills/Holdorf-McCarthy W3.5S33151534277
7Bob Day TC/Slote W3.5S34181737296
8Spring Park/Nolen W3.5S34161943323
9Wagon Wheel/Martinez-Turic W3.5S34161944340
10North Texas RC/Hedblom W3.5S34161946340
11Oak Creek/Smith-Ward W3.5S34132249322
12Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5S24151535295
13North Texas RC/Cole-Votava W3.5S25161943340
14Canyon Creek/Labra W3.5S25152043318
15Samuell Grand/ Leary W3.5S25112451351
16Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni W3.5S1682757392
17Samuell Grand/Leete-Edwards W3.5S07112450347

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Hope Heldmar
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
3.41
Sonali Agrawal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Elizabeth Parsons
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Amy Loehr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Marci Frenkel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Blair Ward
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Jana Chester
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Amber Ostrander
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Morgan Gulbas
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.18
Casey Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Michele Lesslie
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.08
Jackie Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Diana Wohldmann
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
3.02
Heather Smercina
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Julia Dang
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Kathy Engelbrecht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Smercina + Michele Lesslie3456% games+16.3% vs expected
Marci Frenkel + Morgan Gulbas4256% games+9.7% vs expected
Heather Smercina + Diana Wohldmann044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Loehr + Diana Wohldmann123 matchesnot enough data
Amber Ostrander + Jana Chester213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hope Heldmar
22W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.56
Sonali Agrawal
15W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Elizabeth Parsons
14W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Amy Loehr
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
Marci Frenkel
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Blair Ward
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Jana Chester
14W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Amber Ostrander
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Morgan Gulbas
20W–13L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Casey Ellis
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18
Michele Lesslie
24W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.10
3.5
Jackie Nelson
5W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Diana Wohldmann
27W–26L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Heather Smercina
34W–36L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Julia Dang
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Engelbrecht
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.