Teams

Cooper FC/Jimenez W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20Won 21
L#1 DoublesChelsea Hughes / Paloma Leonato vs Amy Cox / Anne French5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Mooney vs Heather Jordan6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKaren Lambrecht / Anita Pai vs Michelle Sowards / Natalia Abramyan7-6, 6-2
2026-06-13vs Wilkerson-Lamarque/Nguyen W3.5SWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Nuffer / Chelsea Hughes vs Hsiao-Wen Chang / Hanh Nguyen6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSerap Karayigen vs Diem Thi Tran6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesElla Benson vs Lory Martin6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-06Lost 12
W#1 SinglesSerap Karayigen vs Jacquelyn Lewis6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAlyssa Tanis / Kavita Khandekar Chopra vs Rhonda Price / Pam Boronski1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Mooney / Anita Pai vs Angela McCarthy / Thao Te0-6, 1-6
2026-05-30vs Brookhaven/Nelson-Wohldmann W3.5SLost 02
L#1 SinglesElla Benson vs Sonali Agrawal5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaloma Leonato / Jennifer Craft vs Julia Dang / Lynn Johnson6-7, 3-6
2026-05-09Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Nuffer / Chelsea Hughes vs Jacqueline Carson / Camille Davenport3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesElla Benson vs Tarryn Uran2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCynthia Jankovich / Serap Karayigen vs Ashley Samber / Melissa Fox4-6, 2-6
2026-05-02vs High Point/Herling W3.5SLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Lambrecht / Lauren Nuffer vs Alysen Northern / Melissa Reynolds3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKavita Khandekar Chopra / Alyssa Tanis vs Jadey Liu / Cathy Joseph3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Ella Benson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Marianna Clement
published
3.35
Susan Coy
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.28
Lauren Nuffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Serap Karayigen
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Sarah Southcott
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
3.17
Karen Lambrecht
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Chelsea Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Amy Kelton
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Shanna Claytor
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Alyssa Tanis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Cynthia Jankovich
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Alexandra Villamarin
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
3.02
Jennifer Craft
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.02
Paloma Leonato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Natalia Jimenez
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.89
Jennifer Mooney
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.82
Anita Pai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Shannon Mahoney
published
Kavita Khandekar Chopra
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kavita Khandekar Chopra + Alyssa Tanis4259% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Jankovich + Alexandra Villamarin213 matchesnot enough data
Karen Lambrecht + Lauren Nuffer123 matchesnot enough data
Paloma Leonato + Serap Karayigen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ella Benson
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Marianna Clement
23W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
Susan Coy
10W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Lauren Nuffer
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
Serap Karayigen
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Sarah Southcott
19W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Karen Lambrecht
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Chelsea Hughes
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amy Kelton
22W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
Shanna Claytor
31W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
3
Alyssa Tanis
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Cynthia Jankovich
11W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Alexandra Villamarin
23W–21L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jennifer Craft
15W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Paloma Leonato
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.02
Natalia Jimenez
15W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Jennifer Mooney
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.89
3
Anita Pai
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Shannon Mahoney
1W–8L career · no lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.71
Kavita Khandekar Chopra
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.