Teams

High Point/Herling W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

17 players · average NTRP 3.42 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Ableman / Debbie Potaniec vs Hazel Robbins / Jenifer Mathews1-6, 4-6
2026-06-06Won 31
L#1 DoublesJadey Liu / Alysen Northern vs Amy Cox / Anne French4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesKaty Bautista vs Heather Jordan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudi Robeson / Linda Dres vs Carrie Martinson / Robin Bates6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSheeri Singh / Kathy Almond vs Annette Delbridge / Lea Ellsworth6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-30vs Wilkerson-Lamarque/Nguyen W3.5SSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlysen Northern / Kristine Killmeyer vs Jenna Dinh / Kim Le7-6, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKaty Bautista vs Lory Martin1-6, 2-6
2026-05-16Split 11
W#1 SinglesKaty Bautista vs Laura Carr7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Dres / Merilee Biancardi vs Mendy Hatley / Lisa Holdorf6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-09Won 10
W#3 DoublesCaitlyn Buxie / Sheeri Singh vs Michele Lesslie / Lynn Johnson7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-02vs Cooper FC/Jimenez W3.5SSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlysen Northern / Melissa Reynolds vs Karen Lambrecht / Lauren Nuffer6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDebbie Potaniec / Kathy Almond vs Shanna Claytor / Alexandra Villamarin2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kristine Killmeyer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
Judi Robeson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.29
Amy Berger
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jadey Liu
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.23
Merilee Biancardi
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.23
Alysen Northern
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Danise McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Susan Ableman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Susie Taub
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Michele Mandell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.03
Sheeri Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Leslee Herling
published
3.00
Linda Dres
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Kathy Almond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Debbie Potaniec
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Caitlyn Buxie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katy Bautista
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Killmeyer + Danise McMahon8654% games+3.6% vs expected
Judi Robeson + Alysen Northern3349% games+0.3% vs expected
Linda Dres + Kathy Almond2639% gamesnot enough data
Judi Robeson + Susan Ableman4353% gamesnot enough data
Michele Mandell + Susan Ableman1434% gamesnot enough data
Danise McMahon + Jadey Liu3254% gamesnot enough data
Kristine Killmeyer + Alysen Northern314 matchesnot enough data
Judi Robeson + Jadey Liu404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Killmeyer
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Judi Robeson
36W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amy Berger
19W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jadey Liu
16W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Merilee Biancardi
17W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alysen Northern
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Danise McMahon
17W–28L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.21
Susan Ableman
11W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
Susie Taub
13W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Michele Mandell
22W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.08
Sheeri Singh
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.03
Leslee Herling
12W–26L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01
Linda Dres
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
Kathy Almond
7W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Debbie Potaniec
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Caitlyn Buxie
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katy Bautista
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.