Teams

Griffin/40/3.0/MXD/QTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Mixed 40 & Over · 3.0 Shrev

14 players · average NTRP 2.89 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-02vs Coats/40/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLance Johnson / Holli Griffin vs Bill Bowdon / Aubree Bunyard2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBob Patterson / Chris Dunn vs Paul Cavell / Emily Douglas3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCraig McCloud / Christine Mcwilliams vs Elisha Coats / William Coats4-6, 4-6
2025-04-14vs Coats/40/3.0/MXD/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Stehr / HOLLY ELLIS vs Chip Bunyard / Aubree Bunyard7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFred Lucky / Chris Dunn vs Bill Bowdon / Kristin van Zandt6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBill Sumner / Carrie Smith vs William Coats / Elisha Coats4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Paul Singh
published
3.00
Erik Luttkus
published 3
2.84
Holli Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Bob Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Craig McCloud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Fred Lucky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
HOLLY ELLIS
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Ryan Stehr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Lance Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Chris Dunn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Christine Mcwilliams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Bill Sumner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kelli Oswalt
published
Kim Lucky
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Mcwilliams + Craig McCloud3452% games+0.7% vs expected
Holli Griffin + Lance Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paul Singh
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.30
3
Erik Luttkus
21W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Holli Griffin
47W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Bob Patterson
19W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Craig McCloud
46W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Fred Lucky
5W–1L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
HOLLY ELLIS
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ryan Stehr
4W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.70
Lance Johnson
12W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Chris Dunn
35W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Christine Mcwilliams
22W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Bill Sumner
35W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
Kelli Oswalt
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Lucky
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.