Teams

Vivante - Voyles

2025 LEECHARLOTTE Combo 18 & Over Winter · 7.5 W

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-19vs Seminole Lakes - KeinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAgnes O'Connor / Penny Henkel vs Lori Vivian / Lisa Saulnier4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-13vs LEECHAR/DingwallLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeah Voyles / Susan Theriault vs Wendy Dingwall / Ann Biever4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Artman / Susan Miller vs Susan DelGreco / Andrea Cooke2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRose Stivers / Sandy Ritter vs Colleen Doyle / Leticia Garcia2-6, 1-6
2025-03-12vs UTC- ShotwellLost 01
L#1 DoublesAgnes O'Connor / Patricia Kowal vs Anita Zellner / Jane Zito7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-02vs Seminole Lakes - DomingoLost 01
L#3 DoublesAgnes O'Connor / Karen Corliss vs Petra Klos / Eva Robertson4-6, 4-6
2025-02-05vs UTC- ShotwellWon 10
W#2 DoublesAgnes O'Connor / Penny Henkel vs Jane Zito / Patricia Duquette7-6, 6-3
2025-01-29vs LEECHAR/DingwallLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Corliss / Agnes O'Connor vs Sonia Denoncourt / Wendy Dingwall0-6, 1-6
2025-01-08vs Seminole Lakes - KeinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Corliss / Agnes O'Connor vs Pamela Keiner / Lisa Saulnier5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Agnes O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.69
Tracy Ford
published
3.33
Sandy Ritter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Penny Henkel
published
Karen Corliss
published
Leah Voyles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Murno
published
Rose Stivers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ruth Coburn
published
Sandra Artman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Theriault
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Agnes O'Connor + Tracy Ford314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Theriault + Leah Voyles134 matchesnot enough data
Agnes O'Connor + Sandra Artman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Agnes O'Connor
34W–53L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Tracy Ford
112W–75L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Sandy Ritter
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Penny Henkel
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Karen Corliss
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Voyles
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Renee Murno
78W–48L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rose Stivers
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Coburn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Artman
20W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Theriault
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.