Teams

300/Cox-Plankenhorn

2026 Alachua Trilevel 18 & Over · Alachua Trilevel 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_2

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Alachua Trilevel 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Rhoda Wilburn
published 4
3.67
Tara Edelstein
published
3.54
Taiana Mendez
published
3.33
Lauren Moehle
published 3.5
3.31
Natalie Ebner
published
3.26
Yaramarie Munoz
published 3.5
3.19
Margot Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Jodi Cox
published
3.08
Mary Plankenhorn
published 3.5
2.76
Linda Vaughn
published
2.70
Wanda Cross
published
Silvia Menendez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taiana Mendez + Yaramarie Munoz033 matchesnot enough data
Tara Edelstein + Margot Maurer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rhoda Wilburn
86W–28L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Tara Edelstein
88W–67L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Taiana Mendez
23W–37L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Lauren Moehle
79W–55L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Natalie Ebner
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Yaramarie Munoz
40W–62L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Margot Maurer
51W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Jodi Cox
6W–17L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Mary Plankenhorn
26W–60L career · no lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
Linda Vaughn
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
Wanda Cross
9W–17L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.70
Silvia Menendez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.