Teams

Ne.Day18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-13vs Le.Boesch18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesHeather Remley vs Elizabeth Hodges2-6, 2-3
2025-07-06vs Le.Boesch18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnastasiya Manet vs Paula Collado Cordon6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNena Marks vs Leslie Boesch6-4, 6-0
2025-06-28vs Le.Boesch18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesNena Marks vs Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesHeather Remley vs MaryBeth Jackson1-6, 2-6
2025-06-22vs Le.Boesch18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesNena Marks vs Emily Perry6-1, 6-3
2025-06-15vs Le.Boesch18SWon 10
W#1 SinglesNena Marks vs Julia Howard6-4, 6-3
2025-06-08vs Le.Boesch18SLost 01
L#1 SinglesHeather Remley vs Angelina Neiberger6-7, 1-6
2025-06-01vs Le.Boesch18SWon 10
W#2 SinglesNena Marks vs Paula Collado Cordon6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.87
Nena Marks
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 5
4.81
Laura Alvarez
published
4.79
Madeline Brown
published
4.69
Anastasiya Manet
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
4.51
Ivette Duran
published
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.29
Kamila Korzeniowska
published
4.19
Charlie Trinco
published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nena Marks + Anastasiya Manet303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Nena Marks
89W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.87
Laura Alvarez
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.81
Madeline Brown
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Anastasiya Manet
31W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.69
Ivette Duran
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
5
Heather Remley
298W–153L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.42
Kamila Korzeniowska
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Charlie Trinco
14W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.