Teams

WNC B Bowie (HRC)

Combo 55 & Over USTA WNC 2023 · WNC Combo 55 & over 7.5 women - Thursday

12 players · average NTRP 3.58 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-10vs WNC M Wiener (ARC S)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Cathy Childress vs Susan Burns / Debbie Berry6-2, 6-2
2023-10-05vs WNC P Harris (Creekside)Won 10
W#3 DoublesLaurie Guinn / TLynn Gilpin vs Pamela Harris / Ellen McGuire6-4, 6-4
2023-09-19vs WNC B Weinland (HRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanette Wayne / TLynn Gilpin vs Sharon Purcell / Kenna Armstrong2-6, 1-6
2023-09-03vs WNC P McClurkin (HRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Christina Phan vs Donna Remenar / Heidi Hendrix6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-31vs WNC J Sweezey (AP)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Heidi Zehr vs Deborah James / Nancy Pryately1-6, 4-6
2023-08-22vs WNC P Harris (Creekside)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Jeanette Wayne vs Bedford Lally / Sheryl King6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WNC Combo 55 & over 7.5 women - Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Beth MacDonald
published 4
3.46
Linda Nash
published
3.42
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Heidi Zehr
published 3.5
3.35
Sharlyn Aamodt
published
3.31
Laurie Guinn
published
3.26
Dottie Mattern
published 3.5
3.21
Roberta Heinrich
published
3.10
Brenda Bowie
published 3.5
3.00
ALICIA KUBIDA
published 3.5
2.90
Sheri Sparks
published
Tracy McKenna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Nash + TLynn Gilpin10069% games+11.5% vs expected
Heidi Zehr + Beth MacDonald2341% gamesnot enough data
Roberta Heinrich + Laurie Guinn123 matchesnot enough data
TLynn Gilpin + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth MacDonald
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Linda Nash
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
TLynn Gilpin
291W–221L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Heidi Zehr
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Sharlyn Aamodt
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laurie Guinn
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Dottie Mattern
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Roberta Heinrich
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brenda Bowie
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
ALICIA KUBIDA
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Sheri Sparks
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Tracy McKenna
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.