Teams

WNC P Harris (Creekside)

Combo 55 & Over USTA WNC 2023 · WNC Combo 55 & over 7.5 women - Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-10-19vs WNC S Corley (ARC-Crowne)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Bedford Lally vs Kelly Hetherington / Elizabeth Etheridge7-5, 6-3
2023-10-12vs WNC J Sweezey (AP)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Hash / Sallie LaChance vs Margaret Deutsch / Kenna Armstrong3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-09-21vs WNC J Sweezey (AP)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSallie LaChance / Lisa Young vs Vickie Massey / Kenna Armstrong4-6, 2-6
2023-08-31vs WNC S Corley (ARC-Crowne)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarie Cowan / Sallie LaChance vs Mary Ann Wendel / Eleanor Thompson3-6, 6-7
2023-08-17vs WNC B Bowie (HRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Young / Sallie LaChance vs Heidi Zehr / Brenda Cook6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WNC Combo 55 & over 7.5 women - Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Theresa Hash
published
3.60
Sallie LaChance
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Donna Davidson
published 3.5
3.32
Bedford Lally
published 3.5
3.30
Cindy Hile
published 3.5
Gaylord Chambers
published 3.5
3.22
Marie Cowan
published
3.20
3.14
MJ Baxter
published
3.14
Angie Rardin
published 3.5
3.04
Ellen McGuire
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Hile + Carolyn Marzendorfer4252% games−5.2% vs expected
Bedford Lally + MJ Baxter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Theresa Hash
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Sallie LaChance
140W–131L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Donna Davidson
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Bedford Lally
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Cindy Hile
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Gaylord Chambers
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Marie Cowan
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Carolyn Marzendorfer
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
MJ Baxter
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Angie Rardin
15W–29L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Ellen McGuire
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.