Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/Ewing

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W PM

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-08-07Won 20
W#1 DoublesKelley Allred / Kathi Poggi vs Stacy Criddle / Debra Knowlton6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJanis Turley vs Claudine Finlay7-5, 6-0
2024-07-31Split 11
W#1 SinglesKathi Poggi vs Manal Hall6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSarah Law / Kathryne Higgins vs Inga Nelson / Diane Creamer7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-27vs Liberty Park Tennis-TrentmanWon 10
W#1 SinglesJanis Turley vs Grace Lin2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-17vs Park City MARC-Smith/ByingtonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesEmilee Hurley vs Alexis Smith6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennie Stacey / Kathi Poggi vs Linda Byington / Brenda Whicker6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-10Won 21
L#1 SinglesEmilee Hurley vs Darla Cardwell3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Wecker / Janis Turley vs Jessica Whittaker / Molly Adams6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennie Stacey / Kathi Poggi vs Maria Pettit / Lori Wilson6-2, 6-1
2024-06-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Leishman / Janis Turley vs JaNean Nelson / Joy Peterson7-5, 6-3
2024-06-19Won 20
W#1 SinglesEmilee Hurley vs Lindsay Moss6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJanis Turley / Jennifer Wecker vs Heather George / Maureen Russo6-0, 6-0
2024-06-12Split 11
W#1 SinglesEmilee Hurley vs Claudine Finlay6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarolee Romney / Kathryne Higgins vs Yoko Walljasper / Danna Miller1-4
2023-10-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Ewing / Kristen Treanor vs Kassie Torres / Diane Poole6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Emilee Hurley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.47
Janis Turley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.38
Sara Ray
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.27
Lisa Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Hannah Lee
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Carolee Romney
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah Law
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.14
Kathi Poggi
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Allison Leishman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.85
Kelley Allred
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #1 Singles 31% · published
Kathryne Higgins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kelly Yuen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kristen Treanor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
LaNece Andreason
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Nicole Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelley Allred + Sara Ray5072% games+35.0% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Sara Ray3260% games+7.9% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Kristen Treanor6353% games+7.2% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Allison Leishman4551% games+5.2% vs expected
Kelly Yuen + Hannah Lee6157% games+2.4% vs expected
Allison Leishman + Sara Ray2551% games+2.3% vs expected
Lisa Ewing + Kristen Treanor9360% games+0.6% vs expected
Lisa Ewing + Allison Leishman405147% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emilee Hurley
95W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.69
Janis Turley
27W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.47
Sara Ray
88W–102L career · 10 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lisa Ewing
123W–122L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.27
Hannah Lee
101W–74L career · 9 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Carolee Romney
134W–164L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Sarah Law
82W–85L career · 5 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Kathi Poggi
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–209L career · 7 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kelley Allred
71W–58L career · 13 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Kathryne Higgins
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelly Yuen
18W–11L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Treanor
40W–61L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
LaNece Andreason
41W–85L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Fisher
100W–62L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.