Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Trentman

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W PM

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-07Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGrace Lin vs Alejandra Gonzalez1-6, 4-6
2024-07-27vs Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/EwingLost 01
L#1 SinglesGrace Lin vs Janis Turley6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-17vs Ogden-MouldingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichelle Weddington / Natalie Stobbe vs Brooke Curtis / Mary Snow7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesGrace Lin vs Tana Coleman4-6, 4-6
2024-07-10Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichelle Weddington / Natalie Stobbe vs Muranda Barker / Naomi Stroud-Peterson6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGrace Lin vs Lisa Beames7-5, 6-3
2024-06-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Weddington / Terri Brunner vs Tiffany Riley / Shauna Lake3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJacki Joseph / Michelle Weddington vs Melissa Hofmann / Bessy Nielson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-06-12vs Liberty Park Tennis-DaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesGrace Lin vs Darla Cardwell2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSharon Larkin / Karen Borski vs Collette Renstrom / Shannon Halverson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Jacki Joseph
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Natalie Stobbe
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Robin Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Heather Sliwa
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Michelle Weddington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Janine Sholeff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Trentman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Celia Steele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Terri Brunner
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.09
Sharree Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.08
Carla Stoddard
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Shelly Kemp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
2.98
Grace Lin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Karen Borski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sara Green
published
Sharon Larkin
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Trentman + Celia Steele7357% games+8.2% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Heather Sliwa7063% games+7.6% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Carla Stoddard11263% games+5.8% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Terri Brunner9852% games+4.6% vs expected
Terri Brunner + Heather Sliwa231253% games+3.9% vs expected
Natalie Stobbe + Michelle Weddington15854% games+2.3% vs expected
Natalie Stobbe + Jacki Joseph5161% games+2.3% vs expected
Shelly Kemp + Terri Brunner161748% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacki Joseph
227W–161L career · 15 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Natalie Stobbe
87W–74L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
Robin Simmons
189W–90L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Heather Sliwa
82W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Michelle Weddington
57W–43L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Janine Sholeff
101W–94L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Ann Trentman
186W–245L career · 10 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Celia Steele
47W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Terri Brunner
142W–142L career · 7 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Sharree Olsen
42W–52L career · 7 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.09
3.5
Carla Stoddard
124W–150L career · 6 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Shelly Kemp
141W–135L career · 10 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.06
3.5
Grace Lin
33W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
2.98
Karen Borski
22W–64L career · 1 line in 2024
82%18%<1%
2.88
Sara Green
25W–70L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Larkin
93W–206L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.