Teams

MEA BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

15 players · average NTRP 4.64 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-26vs CVTA GREYWon 50
W#1 DoublesKenneth Moy / Xinlin Li vs Eric Nguyen / Brian Carlson6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnish Parikh vs Andy Antos6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Walters / Curt Corrigan vs Keaton Howe / Rajeev Anki6-2, 7-6
W#2 SinglesGraham Casden vs Tam Nong5-7, 1-1
W#3 DoublesBob Litwin / Jeff Mortner vs Graham Johnson / Trevor Updegraff7-6, 6-4
2022-05-19vs TTA REDWon 40
W#1 DoublesKenneth Moy / Xinlin Li vs Brian Giesecke / Eric Jaggers6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGraham Casden vs Steven Alvarado6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBob Litwin / Peter Walters vs Marcel de Graaf / Anthony Garcia6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDean Harper / David Jansen vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Brian Loflin1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-05-12vs BTA NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesKenneth Moy / Curt Corrigan vs Timmy Bromell / Rocky Nelson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGraham Casden vs Connor Ohlsen5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Winters / Xinlin Li vs Craig Hoeltgen / Matt Miller2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Jansen / James Bray vs Duncan Burke / Shawn Smith4-6, 5-7
2022-05-05vs CVTA GREYWon 41
W#1 DoublesJames Bray / Johan Mudsam vs Keaton Howe / Tam Nong6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesGraham Casden vs Rajeev Anki6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKenneth Moy / Xinlin Li vs Brian Carlson / Andy Antos6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnish Parikh vs Pranav Barve6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichael Winters / Jeff Mortner vs Graham Johnson / Andrew Grolnick6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-04-28vs TTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKenneth Moy / Xinlin Li vs Ricardo Rodriguez / Philip Dixon-Patterson6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAnish Parikh vs Steven Alvarado5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohan Mudsam / Peter Walters vs Marcel de Graaf / Anthony Garcia6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Winters / Graham Casden vs Eric Jaggers / Daniel Manilla6-3, 6-1
2022-04-21vs BTA NAVYWon 41
W#1 DoublesXinlin Li / Michael Winters vs Horatio Nelson / Shawn Smith6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAnish Parikh vs Connor Ohlsen6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDean Harper / Jeff Mortner vs Brian DeCorte / Matt Miller6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGraham Casden vs JAVIER CHACON6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohan Mudsam / Peter Walters vs AJ Johnson / Craig Hoeltgen7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Anish Parikh
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 5
4.56
Graham Casden
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 5
4.43
Xinlin Li
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.41
James Bray
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.38
Johan Mudsam
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Dean Harper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Curt Corrigan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
David Jansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Peter Walters
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.98
Bob Litwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Jeff Mortner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jonathan Campbell
published
Kenneth Moy
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michael Winters
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Thomas Hauser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Bray + Xinlin Li4358% games+4.8% vs expected
Peter Walters + Curt Corrigan5163% games+4.6% vs expected
Xinlin Li + Johan Mudsam5357% games+2.0% vs expected
Xinlin Li + Kenneth Moy6067% gamesnot enough data
James Bray + Michael Winters2345% gamesnot enough data
Xinlin Li + Michael Winters314 matchesnot enough data
Bob Litwin + Michael Winters134 matchesnot enough data
David Jansen + James Bray123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anish Parikh
38W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.61
5
Graham Casden
14W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.56
Xinlin Li
23W–9L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
4.43
4.5
James Bray
29W–17L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
Johan Mudsam
17W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Dean Harper
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Curt Corrigan
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
David Jansen
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Walters
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Bob Litwin
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.98
Jeff Mortner
7W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jonathan Campbell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kenneth Moy
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Winters
20W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Hauser
6W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.