Teams

CVTA GREY

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-26vs MEA BLUELost 05
L#1 DoublesEric Nguyen / Brian Carlson vs Kenneth Moy / Xinlin Li0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAndy Antos vs Anish Parikh1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKeaton Howe / Rajeev Anki vs Peter Walters / Curt Corrigan2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesTam Nong vs Graham Casden7-5, 1-1
L#3 DoublesGraham Johnson / Trevor Updegraff vs Bob Litwin / Jeff Mortner6-7, 4-6
2022-05-19vs BTA NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesKeaton Howe / Trevor Updegraff vs Matt Miller / Brian DeCorte2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesPranav Barve vs Connor Ohlsen6-7, 3-3
L#2 DoublesGraham Johnson / Eric Nguyen vs AJ Johnson / Craig Hoeltgen1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTam Nong vs Shawn Smith6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndy Antos / Andrew Grolnick vs Timmy Bromell / Paul Kolachov1-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-12vs TTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesTam Nong / Eric Nguyen vs Philip Dixon-Patterson / Brian Loflin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrian Carlson vs Steven Alvarado0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPranav Barve / Graham Johnson vs Ian Harris / Ryan Pelton6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesKeaton Howe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-05vs MEA BLUELost 14
L#1 DoublesKeaton Howe / Tam Nong vs James Bray / Johan Mudsam3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRajeev Anki vs Graham Casden2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Carlson / Andy Antos vs Kenneth Moy / Xinlin Li3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPranav Barve vs Anish Parikh1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGraham Johnson / Andrew Grolnick vs Michael Winters / Jeff Mortner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-04-28vs BTA NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesKeaton Howe / Brian Carlson vs Rocky Nelson / Duncan Burke1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Schifle vs Conner Smith6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRajeev Anki / Graham Johnson vs Matt Miller / Paul Kolachov3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPranav Barve vs Shawn Smith3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndy Antos / Andrew Grolnick vs JAVIER CHACON / Matthew Palmer6-2, 6-3
2022-04-21vs TTA REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesKeaton Howe / Andrew Schifle vs Daniel Manilla / Ricardo Rodriguez5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGraham Johnson vs Steven Alvarado2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Carlson / Rajeev Anki vs Ian Harris / Anthony Garcia6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTrevor Updegraff / Pranav Barve vs Eric Jaggers / Ryan Pelton6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC GREEN6129618255
2LTA BLACK51181228249
3BTA NAVY51181229267
4SSH BLUE52231233281
5CACM YELLOW42181230253
6BVP GREEN42161431257
7CACI NAVY33131739285
8GPTC BLACK34161943340
9SKY GREEN34142146324
10SSH RED24141636258
11MEA PURPLE24121840288
12CVTA GREY24121841300
13MEA NAVY15121842299
14CR RED15102043278
15HRCA RED16142143312
16ATC BLUE16102552359
17DTC SILVER0682247326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Andrew Schifle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Pranav Barve
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Andy Antos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Graham Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Trevor Updegraff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Keaton Howe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.98
Brian Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.77
Andrew Grolnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Rajeev Anki
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Tam Nong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pranav Barve + Graham Johnson4254% games+3.4% vs expected
Keaton Howe + Tam Nong3254% games−3.4% vs expected
Pranav Barve + Keaton Howe4446% games−4.2% vs expected
Brian Carlson + Keaton Howe3343% games−7.2% vs expected
Trevor Updegraff + Keaton Howe134 matchesnot enough data
Pranav Barve + Andrew Schifle314 matchesnot enough data
Pranav Barve + Tam Nong404 matchesnot enough data
Trevor Updegraff + Andy Antos123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Schifle
39W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Pranav Barve
28W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Andy Antos
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Graham Johnson
17W–21L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Trevor Updegraff
45W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Keaton Howe
46W–68L career · 6 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Brian Carlson
17W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Andrew Grolnick
46W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Rajeev Anki
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tam Nong
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.