Teams

MEA NAVY

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-02vs MEA PURPLELost 13
L#1 DoublesAndy James / Jake Thamm vs Andrew Smith / Brian White2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJonah Simon vs Brian MacMillan5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJosh Kahn / Erik Houseman vs Isaac Christensen / Jonathan Howland6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRex Vedder vs Mark Buzek6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-26vs RMTC NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesDavid Cohen / Steve Sims vs Eric Maier / Kenneth McDonald7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRex Vedder vs Brandon Nelsen4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJake Thamm / Ross McCall vs Ben Bertino / Rich Weintraub6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesAndy James vs Richard Thompson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Bennett / Erik Houseman vs Azur Ali / Joshua Harrison3-6, 4-6
2022-05-19vs BRMST REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesSteve Bennett / Jake Thamm vs Noah Sussman / Spencer Bouck4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJonah Simon vs James Colegrove1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRex Vedder / Andy James vs Stephen Pola / Christopher Midanier5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJosh Kahn / Ian Arthur vs John Black / John Hamill7-5, 6-4
2022-05-05vs LTA BLACKLost 23
L#1 DoublesSteve Sims / David Cohen vs David Riffel / Marco Scalise4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJonah Simon vs Gregg Sommer4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSteve Bennett / Jake Thamm vs Jim Wilson / Wayne Sidney6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAndy James vs Nicholas Riffel6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErik Houseman / Josh Kahn vs Idi Omar / Judson Smith6-3, 6-2
2022-04-28vs MEA PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Cohen / Ross McCall vs Mark Buzek / Brad Michalchuk7-6, 7-6
L#2 DoublesIan Arthur / Jake Thamm vs Brian MacMillan / Brian White4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSteve Sims / Erik Houseman vs Matt Schwartz / Scott Kornreich4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-04-21vs RMTC NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesSteve Sims / Andy James vs Eric Maier / Rich Weintraub6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJonah Simon vs Brandon Nelsen1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJake Thamm / Steve Bennett vs Patrick Sprowls / Kenneth McDonald4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 SinglesRex Vedder vs Ben Bertino0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesErik Houseman / Josh Kahn vs David Henderson / Rustin Necessary4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC GREEN6129618255
2LTA BLACK51181228249
3BTA NAVY51181229267
4SSH BLUE52231233281
5CACM YELLOW42181230253
6BVP GREEN42161431257
7CACI NAVY33131739285
8GPTC BLACK34161943340
9SKY GREEN34142146324
10SSH RED24141636258
11MEA PURPLE24121840288
12CVTA GREY24121841300
13MEA NAVY15121842299
14CR RED15102043278
15HRCA RED16142143312
16ATC BLUE16102552359
17DTC SILVER0682247326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Jake Thamm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Steve Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.09
Erik Houseman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.05
Steve Sims
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.01
Rex Vedder
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.77
Andy James
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
Jonah Simon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Josh Kahn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ross McCall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Houseman + Steve Sims3352% games+5.5% vs expected
Steve Bennett + Erik Houseman5646% games−2.4% vs expected
Andy James + Steve Bennett4350% games−2.5% vs expected
Jake Thamm + Steve Bennett1446% games−3.8% vs expected
Andy James + Rex Vedder0535% games−8.1% vs expected
Andy James + Jake Thamm0737% games−13.4% vs expected
Rex Vedder + Josh Kahn134 matchesnot enough data
Steve Bennett + Josh Kahn224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jake Thamm
6W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve Bennett
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Erik Houseman
16W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
Steve Sims
15W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
4.05
Rex Vedder
10W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.01
4
Andy James
14W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Jonah Simon
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Josh Kahn
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ross McCall
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.