Teams

CR RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-26vs SSLT REDLost 05
L#1 DoublesRyan James / Greg Swan vs Matthew Mozia / Gary Dias2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNick Taylor vs Herb Miller2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesZac Storatz / Ben Caruso vs Todd Yokomichi / Derek Niehus1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesScott Sajowitz vs Benjamin Schlichting2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Hupf / David Uekert vs Michael Alexander / Aaron Kirkpatrick2-6, 2-6
2022-05-19vs RRTC REDWon 40
W#1 SinglesNick Taylor vs Sung Bae6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Sajowitz / Zac Storatz vs Kyle Kickhaefer / Thomas Knowles6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesGreg Swan vs Rajeev Aggarwal6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Epping / Robert Gabriel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-12vs CACI NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichael Hupf / Ryan James vs Thomas Bove / Robert Hartman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBen Caruso vs Michael Menghini6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Epping / Scott Sajowitz vs Fadi Zakhem / Hani Zakhem0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGustavo Belloso / Dennis Coonan vs Steve Zubowicz / Jordan Mendell6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-05-05vs SSH REDLost 14
W#1 DoublesWilliam Epping / Zac Storatz vs Eric Wohl / Andrew Treloar6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNick Taylor vs Jeremie Jeremie6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Hupf / Robert Gabriel vs Scott Sagel / Brett Shrewsbury1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGustavo Belloso vs Jeff Gugliotto6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Uekert / Dennis Coonan vs Blair MacNeill / Gregory Nelson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-28vs SSLT BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesRobert Gabriel / Zac Storatz vs David Hitchings / Andrew Holmes1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesGreg Swan vs Tomo Watanabe3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNick Taylor / Ryan James vs Edward Thompson / Andrew Folkerth6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesGustavo Belloso vs Cedric Asensio4-6, 2-6
2022-04-21vs LTFC REDLost 14
L#1 DoublesGustavo Belloso / Dennis Coonan vs Chris Blackman / Alan McDaniel3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBen Caruso vs Tom Patterson4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Gabriel / Scott Sajowitz vs Christopher Hillary / Mickey Plotkin4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGreg Swan vs Christopher Dillon3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Hupf / Ryan James vs Tyler Engel / Brian Vickery6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · MEN 4.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC GREEN6129618255
2LTA BLACK51181228249
3BTA NAVY51181229267
4SSH BLUE52231233281
5CACM YELLOW42181230253
6BVP GREEN42161431257
7CACI NAVY33131739285
8GPTC BLACK34161943340
9SKY GREEN34142146324
10SSH RED24141636258
11MEA PURPLE24121840288
12CVTA GREY24121841300
13MEA NAVY15121842299
14CR RED15102043278
15HRCA RED16142143312
16ATC BLUE16102552359
17DTC SILVER0682247326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Scott Sajowitz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.22
Nick Taylor
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.11
Ryan James
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.10
William Epping
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Gustavo Belloso
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.93
Zac Storatz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Michael Hupf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ben Caruso
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Dennis Coonan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Greg Swan
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zac Storatz + Gustavo Belloso3450% games+9.3% vs expected
Ryan James + Michael Hupf134 matchesnot enough data
Zac Storatz + Michael Hupf224 matchesnot enough data
Zac Storatz + William Epping224 matchesnot enough data
William Epping + Gustavo Belloso314 matchesnot enough data
Zac Storatz + Nick Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Nick Taylor + Gustavo Belloso033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Scott Sajowitz
33W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
Nick Taylor
17W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
Ryan James
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
William Epping
34W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Gustavo Belloso
14W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
Zac Storatz
25W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.93
Michael Hupf
4W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.91
Ben Caruso
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Dennis Coonan
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Greg Swan
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.