Teams

Single Ladies

2022 DC WTA Singles · DC WTA Singles 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.60 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-09-18vs Piney RunWon 21
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Mindy Blakney6-3, 2-3
L#2 SinglesAnjali Garg vs Hannah Yoo6-4, 1-4
W#3 SinglesAndaiye Hamilton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-17vs Set2WinWon 21
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Kirah Yen6-4, 3-2
L#2 SinglesAnjali Garg vs Caitlin Bergo4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAndaiye Hamilton vs Amy Cahoon2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-10vs Set2WinSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Emily Wong6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSimone Saunches vs Caitlin Bergo7-6, 2-1
2022-08-28vs Smash GirlsSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSimone Saunches vs Catherine McQueen5-7, 3-2
W#3 SinglesAnjali Garg vs Jerrica Goodson6-4, 6-4
2022-08-27vs Piney RunLost 02
L#1 SinglesAndaiye Hamilton vs Alissa Lee6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAnjali Garg vs Kera Tyler1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-08-21vs Smash GirlsWon 10
W#2 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Catherine McQueen6-1, 5-5
2022-08-20vs Set2WinSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Julia Cusick6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesAnjali Garg vs LaTonya Young-Clayborne2-6, 2-6
2022-08-13vs Piney RunWon 20
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Hannah Yoo6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAndaiye Hamilton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-30vs Smash GirlsWon 10
W#1 SinglesChanpen Teeranon vs Elena Molchanova6-1, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Lucy Wang
published
3.74
Chanpen Teeranon
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 4
3.49
Jacinda Johnson
published 3.5
3.37
Anjali Garg
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Andaiye Hamilton
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Tracy Walls
published
3.15
Simone Saunches
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andaiye Hamilton + Anjali Garg4154% gamesnot enough data
Andaiye Hamilton + Tracy Walls033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lucy Wang
33W–16L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.85
4
Chanpen Teeranon
209W–208L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Jacinda Johnson
37W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Anjali Garg
230W–135L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Andaiye Hamilton
305W–151L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Tracy Walls
23W–32L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Simone Saunches
91W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.