Teams

Set2Win

2022 DC WTA Singles · DC WTA Singles 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-17vs Single LadiesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesCaitlin Bergo vs Anjali Garg6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Andaiye Hamilton6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2022-09-10vs Single LadiesSplit 11
L#2 SinglesCaitlin Bergo vs Simone Saunches6-7, 1-2
W#3 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs Jacinda Johnson6-1, 6-4
2022-08-28vs Piney RunLost 01
L#1 SinglesKristin Hume vs Elizabeth Plaza1-6, 2-6
2022-08-27vs Smash GirlsWon 10
W#3 SinglesCaitlin Bergo vs Miyako Pastor6-0, 6-6
2022-08-20vs Single LadiesWon 10
W#3 SinglesLaTonya Young-Clayborne vs Anjali Garg6-2, 6-2
2022-08-14vs Piney RunWon 10
W#3 SinglesLaTonya Young-Clayborne vs Hannah Yoo6-3, 4-4
2022-08-13vs Smash GirlsLost 01
L#3 SinglesPamela Gelfond vs Lorena Alfaro4-6, 1-1
2022-08-06vs Piney RunWon 10
W#1 SinglesAmy Cahoon vs Elizabeth Plaza6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Kirah Yen
published
3.37
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Amy Cahoon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Pamela Gelfond
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Eliza Green
published 3.5
Emily Wong
published 3.5
3.17
Elizabeth Blair
published 3.5
3.17
Jodi Paci
published
3.01
Julia Cusick
published
2.96
Caitlin Bergo
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.92
Kristin Hume
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.62
Patricia Prince
published
Rachael Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Prince + Caitlin Bergo2431% games−11.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kirah Yen
42W–29L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
LaTonya Young-Clayborne
99W–83L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Amy Cahoon
181W–281L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Pamela Gelfond
81W–119L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Eliza Green
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Emily Wong
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Blair
21W–26L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Jodi Paci
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
Julia Cusick
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Caitlin Bergo
75W–57L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Kristin Hume
39W–55L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
Patricia Prince
49W–52L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Rachael Smith
0W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.