Teams

ATC BLACK

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-27vs SS-LT REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesZachary Davis / Chapin Schott vs Chip Hudson / Grant Glenn5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesZachary Bishop vs Nick Taylor6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Roosevelt / Jeremy Behm-Meyer vs Brad Shores / Andrew Folkerth6-4, 6-1
2026-08-20vs SS-H NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrett Fischer / Zachary Bishop vs Josh Dougan / Matthew Bruff3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Eckelberger vs Benjamin Reimer4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Washburne / Jeremy Behm-Meyer vs Jose Amador / Rob Mullins6-2, 6-2
2026-08-06vs HRCA-N BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesZachary Bishop / David Eckelberger vs Brian Crawley / Jade Walle7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJeremy Behm-Meyer vs Cody MacIntyre5-7, 1-6
2026-07-30vs GAC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrett Fischer / Robert Brown vs Chris Cremer / Jacob Toffler6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChapin Schott vs Ryan Beckstrom2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeremy Behm-Meyer / Daniel Washburne vs Adam Burbary / JD Ready6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-07-23vs EM REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Washburne / Brett Fischer vs Peter Ericson / Mark Lindstrom1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJeremy Behm-Meyer vs Randy Mancherian6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesZachary Davis / Charles Roosevelt vs Kent Redding / Bill Speck2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SS-H NAVY3063672
2ATC BLACK21541080
3CP SILVER1133761
4WP BLACK03361297
5WP-G GREEN032715102
6VC GREEN031817110

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Zachary Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.33
Jeremy Behm-Meyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
4.32
David Eckelberger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Brett Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.16
Chapin Schott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Daniel Washburne
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Charles Roosevelt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Huntington Walker
published
3.73
Zachary Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Fischer + Daniel Washburne1544% gamesnot enough data
Charles Roosevelt + Daniel Washburne5152% gamesnot enough data
Brett Fischer + Zachary Bishop314 matchesnot enough data
Brett Fischer + Charles Roosevelt213 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Davis + Charles Roosevelt123 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Washburne + Huntington Walker123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zachary Bishop
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Jeremy Behm-Meyer
72W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.33
4.5
David Eckelberger
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Brett Fischer
34W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Chapin Schott
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4.5
Daniel Washburne
42W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Charles Roosevelt
25W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
Huntington Walker
5W–14L career · no lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.03
Zachary Davis
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.