Teams

WP-G GREEN

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-23vs CP SILVERWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Crook / Max Coates vs Roman Khmelev / Nick Salazar3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDaniel Segan vs Jason Alexander6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJake Hugenberg / Zachary Branigan vs Jeff Crosley / Paul Suyumov7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-08-20vs WP BLACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesLucas Puiggari / Daniel Segan vs Michael Matthews / Robbie May7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJake Hugenberg vs Jonathan Jessup6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJames Colegrove / Ethan Liederman vs Nick Law / Mickey Plotkin4-6, 2-6
2026-08-06vs CACM YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Vartuli / Max Coates vs Matthew Wiens / Scott Justus5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristopher McCarthy vs Aaron Weil1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesZachary Branigan / Ethan Liederman vs Chad Picard / Ben Atlee4-6, 2-6
2026-07-30vs CP GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesDaniel Segan / Christopher McCarthy vs Nicolas Perocheau / Adam Abraham7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJake Hugenberg vs David Barry3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLucas Puiggari / Zachary Branigan vs MATTHEW BLAIR / John Greves4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-23vs DTC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesEthan Liederman / Michael Vartuli vs Kenneth McDonald / Adrian Johnson4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJames Colegrove vs Neil Allman0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMax Coates / John Crook vs Andrew Manguart / Kevin Hays7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SS-H NAVY3063672
2ATC BLACK21541080
3CP SILVER1133761
4WP BLACK03361297
5WP-G GREEN032715102
6VC GREEN031817110

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Daniel Segan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Christopher McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.13
Michael Vartuli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Ethan Liederman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.07
Jake Hugenberg
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.04
Lucas Puiggari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.00
Max Coates
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
John Crook
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
James Colegrove
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.84
Zachary Branigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Crook + Max Coates2345% games+1.7% vs expected
Daniel Segan + Christopher McCarthy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Segan
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
4.48
4.5
Christopher McCarthy
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
Michael Vartuli
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
Ethan Liederman
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
4.13
Jake Hugenberg
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Lucas Puiggari
21W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
Max Coates
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
4.00
John Crook
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
James Colegrove
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.87
Zachary Branigan
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
3.84

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.