Teams

Farrelly/Carrato

2023 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Carrie Putsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.58
Tina Farrelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Sarah Carrato
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results8 ties
2023-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Kanz / Carrie Putsch vs Kirsten Holmes / Sara van Beckum4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesTina Farrelly / Carrie Putsch vs Leah Buxman / Mary Klinger6-2, 6-4
2023-08-02Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Carrato / Holly Kanz vs Nikki Blackburn-Orr / Karen McNairy6-1, 6-4
2023-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Kanz / Tina Farrelly vs Cate Harrington / Morgan Sugar-BUtter7-5, 6-1
2023-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Carrato / Carrie Putsch vs Erin Hill / Tami McAra7-6, 7-6
2023-07-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHolly Kanz / Carrie Putsch vs Jin Velasco / Sara van Beckum6-2, 7-6
2023-07-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTina Farrelly / Holly Kanz vs Erin Casey / Colleen Nolan6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-06-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTina Farrelly / Sarah Carrato vs Inna Vlad / Karina Frid6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Carrie Putsch
62W–49L career
2%98%0%
3.73
4
Tina Farrelly
115W–45L career
14%86%0%
3.58
4
Sarah Carrato
77W–66L career
55%45%0%
3.42

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.