Teams

CV-Desert Princess/Micale & Orban

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-20vs CV-Cathedral Canyon/Jane PellerWon 10
W#1 DoublesMerri Wells / Maribeth Pullman vs Stephanie Arnheim / Sharon Weinberg6-2, 6-3
2023-02-20vs CV-Embassy Tennis Club/SashaLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzette Willetts / Merri Wells vs Jane Whitney / Elaine Reddick-Cooley3-6, 3-6
2023-02-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesMerri Wells / Maribeth Pullman vs Agnes Hoffman / Jayne Spector6-2, 7-6
L#1 DoublesMerri Wells / Shelley Lynch vs Janice Campbell / Nancy Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMerri Wells / Catherine Lind vs Kathy Rogers / Mary Fox6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-01-09vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/D MacdonaldWon 10
W#1 DoublesMerri Wells / Suzette Willetts vs Sarah Angus / Melanie Ditton6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Gianna Riley
published
Catherine Lind
published 4
3.64
Merri Wells
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Andrea Primer
published 3.5
3.36
Ann Tennyson
published 3.5
3.35
Suzette Willetts
published
3.32
Maribeth Pullman
published
3.30
Denise Roethenmund
published 3.5
3.15
Shelley Lynch
published
Gina Orban
published
Laura Susskind
published
Michele Weddle
published
Rebecca Jasmine
published
Sanae Chance
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gianna Riley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Catherine Lind
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Merri Wells
70W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.64
3.5
Andrea Primer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Ann Tennyson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Suzette Willetts
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
Maribeth Pullman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Denise Roethenmund
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Shelley Lynch
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
Gina Orban
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Laura Susskind
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michele Weddle
7W–20L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sanae Chance
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.