Teams

CV-Embassy Tennis Club/Sasha

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-06vs LLW-CV-Deep Canyon/B StoneLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Sally Schwartz vs Blair Stone / Kathryn Sullivan6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-27vs CV-Indian Wells TG/PlatisWon 10
W#3 DoublesSally Schwartz / Cheryl Capriola vs Karin Barnes / Jennifer Ruddell6-2, 6-2
2023-02-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesCathy Evangelist / Cheryl Capriola vs Lisa McIntosh / Pamela Larson7-5, 6-3
2023-02-20vs CV-Desert Princess/Micale & OrbanLost 01
L#3 DoublesMei Leckenby / Cheryl Capriola vs Laura Susskind / Gianna Riley4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSally Schwartz / Cheryl Capriola vs Maria Skilton / Jeannie Gilbert6-0, 6-1
2023-02-10vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/D MacdonaldWon 10
W#3 DoublesSally Schwartz / Cheryl Capriola vs Faith Zelenko / Susan Burns6-1, 7-5
2023-02-08vs CV-Sun City PD/KimLost 01
L#3 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Ann Morford vs Grace Baraniak / Nadine Kim1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCheryl Capriola / Sally Schwartz vs Maria Himelman / Paula Doritty6-4, 6-1
2023-01-30vs CV-Mission Hills/MoskowitzWon 10
W#1 DoublesCatherine Leogrande / Cheryl Capriola vs Marta Mykytyn-Hill / Molly Woods6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Tammy Pronenko
published
3.79
Jane Whitney
published
3.75
Cheryl Capriola
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.17
3.10
Barb Stoliker
published 3.5
Beverly Haller
published
Julie Kratzig
published
Lisa Buttjes
published
Mei Leckenby
published
Sue Velarde
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Pronenko
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Jane Whitney
7W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Cheryl Capriola
114W–48L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Elaine Reddick-Cooley
25W–24L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Barb Stoliker
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Catherine Leogrande
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Beverly Haller
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julie Kratzig
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Buttjes
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mei Leckenby
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sue Velarde
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.