Teams

Eichenberg, Mary

2021 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 5.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.86 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-01-17vs Gehrke, JackieLost 12
W#1 DoublesFiona Rey / Alecia Fiscus vs Laryssa Booth / Cindy Lim6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristen Stivers vs Michaela Henne3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Jarvis / Elizabeth Decker vs Valerie Marks / Diane Kakareka2-6, 3-6
2020-12-20vs Gifford MichelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Stivers / Michelle Hall vs Lyndy Volker / Tawni Bozarth6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMary Eichenberg / Fiona Rey vs Michelle Gifford / Samantha Pennington4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2020-12-13vs Gehrke, JackieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Svetlic / Fiona Rey vs Valerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi5-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesMary Eichenberg / Deborah Fabrizius vs Jackie Gehrke / Andrea Wolfe7-5, 3-2
2020-11-22vs Gifford MichelleWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Jarvis / Elizabeth Decker vs Michelle Gifford / Thresa Lampe3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Hall vs Sanja Hardy6-2, 2-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Fabrizius / Fiona Rey vs Lyndy Volker / Tawni Bozarth6-2, 6-3
2020-11-15vs Gehrke, JackieWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Eichenberg / Michelle Hall vs Valerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFiona Rey vs Michaela Henne3-6, 5-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Stivers / Alecia Fiscus vs Diane Kakareka / Andrea Wolfe6-7, 3-1, 1-0
2020-11-01vs Gifford MichelleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Hall / Yuliana Shipp vs Lyndy Volker / Tawni Bozarth6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFiona Rey vs Gwyneth Gifford2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChristina Svetlic / Heather Andrews vs Michelle Gifford / Thresa Lampe0-6, 4-6
2020-10-25vs Gehrke, JackieLost 12
L#1 DoublesFiona Rey / Emma Schelble vs Valerie Marks / Laryssa Booth1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Hall vs Diane Kakareka6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Fabrizius / Christina Svetlic vs Lorie Zacharias-Verdi / Michaela Henne0-6, 3-6
2020-10-24vs Gifford MichelleWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Fabrizius / Emma Schelble vs Samantha Pennington / Melissa Juelis5-7, 4-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Eichenberg vs Sanja Hardy7-6, 4-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Svetlic / Kristen Stivers vs Lyndy Volker / Tawni Bozarth3-6, 6-7
2020-10-11vs Gifford MichelleWon 20
W#1 DoublesFiona Rey / Heather Andrews vs Thresa Lampe / Tawni Bozarth6-7, 4-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Eichenberg / Deborah Fabrizius vs Michelle Gifford / Melissa Juelis6-3, 6-2
2020-10-04vs Gehrke, JackieWon 21
W#1 DoublesFiona Rey / Jill Waldman vs Valerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKristen Stivers vs Andrea Wolfe3-6, 4-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Eichenberg / Elizabeth Decker vs Jackie Gehrke / Laryssa Booth2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.76
Kristen Stivers
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Christina Svetlic
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 5
Emma Schelble
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.68
Jill Waldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.63
Deborah Fabrizius
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.48
Fiona Rey
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 5
4.30
Heather Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.21
Elizabeth Decker
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Mary Eichenberg
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Michelle Hall
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fiona Rey + Michelle Hall6069% games+14.6% vs expected
Fiona Rey + Emma Schelble7356% games+2.2% vs expected
Fiona Rey + Jill Waldman7752% games−2.3% vs expected
Deborah Fabrizius + Fiona Rey224 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Fabrizius + Mary Eichenberg404 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Fabrizius + Michelle Hall303 matchesnot enough data
Deborah Fabrizius + Emma Schelble303 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Decker + Heather Andrews213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Stivers
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
4.76
5
Christina Svetlic
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
5
Emma Schelble
17W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
5
Jill Waldman
61W–31L career · 1 line in 2021
8%91%1%
4.68
5
Deborah Fabrizius
46W–41L career · 5 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
4.63
5
Fiona Rey
61W–35L career · 9 lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
4.48
4.5
Heather Andrews
34W–20L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Elizabeth Decker
78W–40L career · 12 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
4.21
Mary Eichenberg
13W–6L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Hall
30W–2L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.