Teams

Gehrke, Jackie

2021 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 5.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-01-17vs Eichenberg, MaryWon 21
L#1 DoublesLaryssa Booth / Cindy Lim vs Fiona Rey / Alecia Fiscus4-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichaela Henne vs Kristen Stivers6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesValerie Marks / Diane Kakareka vs Elizabeth Jarvis / Elizabeth Decker6-2, 6-3
2021-01-10vs Gifford MichelleWon 30
W#1 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Laryssa Booth vs Michelle Gifford / Thresa Lampe7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichaela Henne vs Tawni Bozarth6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesValerie Marks / Diane Kakareka vs Lyndy Volker / Samantha Pennington6-3, 6-1
2020-12-13vs Eichenberg, MaryWon 21
W#1 DoublesValerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi vs Christina Svetlic / Fiona Rey7-5, 5-3
W#1 SinglesDiane Kakareka vs Alecia Fiscus6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Andrea Wolfe vs Mary Eichenberg / Deborah Fabrizius5-7, 2-3
2020-12-06vs Gifford MichelleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Andrea Wolfe vs Michelle Gifford / Thresa Lampe5-7, 1-4
L#1 SinglesDiane Kakareka vs Tawni Bozarth3-6, 4-4
W#2 DoublesValerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi vs Lyndy Volker / Samantha Pennington6-2, 6-1
2020-11-15vs Eichenberg, MaryLost 12
L#1 DoublesValerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi vs Mary Eichenberg / Michelle Hall6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichaela Henne vs Fiona Rey6-3, 4-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDiane Kakareka / Andrea Wolfe vs Kristen Stivers / Alecia Fiscus7-6, 1-3, 0-1
2020-11-08vs Gifford MichelleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Laryssa Booth vs Sanja Hardy / Tawni Bozarth6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAndrea Wolfe / Michaela Henne vs Michelle Gifford / Thresa Lampe7-5, 1-4, 1-0
2020-10-25vs Eichenberg, MaryWon 21
W#1 DoublesValerie Marks / Laryssa Booth vs Fiona Rey / Emma Schelble6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDiane Kakareka vs Michelle Hall0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Michaela Henne vs Deborah Fabrizius / Christina Svetlic6-0, 6-3
2020-10-18vs Gifford MichelleLost 02
L#1 DoublesValerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi vs Gwyneth Gifford / Lyndy Volker6-7, 3-4
L#2 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Diane Kakareka vs Michelle Gifford / Thresa Lampe5-7, 0-1
2020-10-04vs Eichenberg, MaryLost 12
L#1 DoublesValerie Marks / Lorie Zacharias-Verdi vs Fiona Rey / Jill Waldman2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAndrea Wolfe vs Kristen Stivers6-3, 3-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Laryssa Booth vs Mary Eichenberg / Elizabeth Decker6-2, 6-1
2020-09-27vs Gifford MichelleLost 12
W#1 DoublesLorie Zacharias-Verdi / Laryssa Booth vs Michelle Gifford / Thresa Lampe7-6, 4-3
L#1 SinglesDiane Kakareka vs Tawni Bozarth7-5, 2-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Gehrke / Andrea Wolfe vs Lyndy Volker / Samantha Pennington4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.03
Michaela Henne
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Andrea Wolfe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 5
4.60
Valerie Marks
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
4.46
Jackie Gehrke
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.32
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.25
Diane Kakareka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Cindy Lim
published 4
Laryssa Booth
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Marks + Laryssa Booth5161% games+11.6% vs expected
Jackie Gehrke + Laryssa Booth8166% games+11.1% vs expected
Diane Kakareka + Andrea Wolfe4355% games+7.0% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Lorie Zacharias-Verdi191755% games+2.1% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Diane Kakareka4161% games−2.4% vs expected
Jackie Gehrke + Diane Kakareka6952% games−3.5% vs expected
Jackie Gehrke + Andrea Wolfe31043% games−8.5% vs expected
Valerie Marks + Andrea Wolfe2354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michaela Henne
37W–23L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
5.03
5
Andrea Wolfe
30W–42L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Valerie Marks
100W–57L career · 8 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
4.60
4.5
Jackie Gehrke
158W–94L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Lorie Zacharias-Verdi
120W–97L career · type A · 7 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Diane Kakareka
51W–42L career · 8 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
4.25
4
Cindy Lim
30W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%3%97%
4.24
Laryssa Booth
32W–9L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.