Teams

PRC BLUE

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-17vs RRTC NAVYLost 03
L#1 SinglesChristine Heimbuck vs Khanh Gifford3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Teresa Hymowitz / Deborah Grillo6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGina Lurie / Norine Nelson Martin vs Carleen Himel / Elizabeth Quinn2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-10vs PRC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 SinglesChristine Heimbuck vs Dana van Daele3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Erica Westphal vs Carol Lugo / Heather Beasley2-6, 3-6
2025-07-03vs PCRK BLUEWon 20
W#2 DoublesErica Westphal / Christie Dyer vs Nickie Le / Cathy Shahan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-26vs CPV BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesErica Westphal / Keenan Young vs Jami Keenan / Carol Lail2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNorine Nelson Martin / Gina Lurie vs Debbie Conner / Kerry Duffie5-7, 5-7
2025-06-12vs LTFC PINKLost 02
L#1 DoublesErica Westphal / Keenan Young vs Lisa Zook / Karen Wendling3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLisa Wiggins / Natalie Vickers vs Svetlana Kolesnikova / Lauren Hillary2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-05vs SS-LT NAVYSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMegan Kendrick / Natalie Vickers vs Bernadette Rottschafer / Carrie Bryan2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGina Lurie / Renee Wentworth vs Barbara Hall / Denise Debartolomeis4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Natalie Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Megan Kendrick
published
3.41
Wendy Mosley
published
3.31
Christine Heimbuck
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
3.27
Erica Westphal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Christie Dyer
published 3.5
3.23
Cindy Sanders
published 3.5
3.19
Keenan Young
published
3.18
Amy Quinette
published 3.5
3.17
Gina Lurie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Melissa Wiseman
published
3.13
Sabrina Alvarez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Vickers + Wendy Mosley4167% games+9.4% vs expected
Gina Lurie + Norine Nelson Martin12457% games+8.6% vs expected
Keenan Young + Christie Dyer9456% games+2.7% vs expected
Christie Dyer + Wendy Mosley8259% games+0.9% vs expected
Amy Quinette + Erica Westphal4153% games−1.6% vs expected
Cindy Sanders + Amy Quinette1445% games−8.6% vs expected
Erica Westphal + Gina Lurie4643% games−11.2% vs expected
Sabrina Alvarez + Keenan Young224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalie Vickers
90W–47L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Megan Kendrick
16W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Wendy Mosley
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Christine Heimbuck
77W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Norine Nelson Martin
28W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Erica Westphal
83W–76L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christie Dyer
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cindy Sanders
17W–22L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Keenan Young
34W–23L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Quinette
74W–125L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Gina Lurie
108W–107L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Melissa Wiseman
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Sabrina Alvarez
14W–17L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.