Teams

SS-LT NAVY

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-17vs PRC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs Billie Aguilar / Isabella Latak4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDanita Geise vs Dana van Daele6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Denise Debartolomeis vs Lori McDevitt / Cheri Walker5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-10vs CPV BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs Jami Keenan / Carol Lail2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBernadette Rottschafer / Karen Eagleton vs Sky Kurz / Debbie Conner6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Zoeller / Denise Debartolomeis vs Susan Miles / Samantha Hanson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-03Won 40
W#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDanita Geise vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Bernadette Rottschafer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDenise Debartolomeis / Lynne Monnar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-26vs RRTC NAVYWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Lynne Monnar vs Ashley Franklin / Marnie Brockamp4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDanita Geise vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMelinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault vs Elise Marks-Gruitch / Elizabeth Quinn6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Eagleton / Denise Debartolomeis vs Bobbie Turner / Seanna Mulligan6-4, 6-2
2025-06-19vs PCRK BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristen Arsenault / Melinda Conover vs Jennifer Rider / Jacque Montgomery6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDanita Geise vs Stacey Gilmore3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBernadette Rottschafer / Karen Eagleton vs Nickie Le / Gina Roth6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDiana Zoeller / Barbara Hall vs Stephanie Stavri / Shannon Bice3-6, 6-7
2025-06-12vs SS-LT GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristen Arsenault / Melinda Conover vs Ellen Thompson / Brenda Lillard6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDanita Geise vs Jennifer Cree2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie Bryan / Lynne Monnar vs Kristi Mathieson / Karen McIntire6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBarbara Hall / Bernadette Rottschafer vs Julie Fujita / Carin Buster6-2, 6-3
2025-06-05vs PRC BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMelinda Conover / Lynne Monnar vs Wendy Mosley / Melissa Wiseman2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBernadette Rottschafer / Carrie Bryan vs Megan Kendrick / Natalie Vickers6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Hall / Denise Debartolomeis vs Gina Lurie / Renee Wentworth6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Melinda Conover
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.38
Carrie Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Danita Geise
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Kristen Arsenault
published
3.32
Lynne Monnar
published 3.5
3.26
Bernadette Rottschafer
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Barbara Hall
published 3.5
3.18
Karen Eagleton
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Diana Zoeller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Denise Debartolomeis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynne Monnar + Melinda Conover8260% games+8.8% vs expected
Melinda Conover + Kristen Arsenault311257% games+1.9% vs expected
Barbara Hall + Carrie Bryan6850% games+0.3% vs expected
Carrie Bryan + Lynne Monnar2452% games−0.7% vs expected
Melinda Conover + Karen Eagleton8460% games−1.1% vs expected
Bernadette Rottschafer + Karen Eagleton231456% games−5.1% vs expected
Carrie Bryan + Diana Zoeller191553% games−6.2% vs expected
Bernadette Rottschafer + Melinda Conover6159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melinda Conover
104W–41L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Carrie Bryan
113W–78L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Danita Geise
44W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kristen Arsenault
38W–19L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Lynne Monnar
110W–98L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Bernadette Rottschafer
132W–87L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Hall
32W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Karen Eagleton
154W–121L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Diana Zoeller
52W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Denise Debartolomeis
83W–107L career · 5 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.