Teams

St.Rabby40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-08vs La.Capps40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesMonica Shea-Henderson / Andrea Pfeiffer vs LeAnne Bloedon / Amy Pena2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAveril Glover / Kathryn Beth Beam vs Sharon Baggett / Julia Perkins4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDana Weiland / Yuliya Barthes vs Laura Capps / Julie Kelly1-6, 3-6
2024-10-04vs Ch.Bason40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Dickson / Andrea Pfeiffer vs KATRINA SIZEMORE / Jane Hunter0-6, 2-6
2024-09-23vs Yv.Barrow40C7.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Tiffany Harris vs Mary Beth Broyles / Allison Glenn1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAveril Glover / Kathleen Tsibulsky vs Susan Watson / Cameron Ellerbe0-6, 1-6
2024-09-20vs Ra.Mills40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Weiland / Stephanie Rabby vs Michelle Welborn / Rebecca Sears6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Monica Shea-Henderson vs Helen Harris / Kylie Harris6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-06vs Le.Corn40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeigh Kimball / Nancy Baird vs Andrea McCartney / Gretchen Swank6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Tsibulsky / Averil Glover vs Melissa Liner / Diane Allen2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Dickson / Martha Zurawel vs Alexis Johnson / Leslie Corn1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-08-29vs An.Kinlaw40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Leigh Kimball vs Carol Muth / Holly Lotterhos7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Zurawel / Michelle Dickson vs Heather Slinkard / Karen Hagens7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-08-23vs Hol.Camak40CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrea Pfeiffer / Leigh Kimball vs Isabelle Homes Gesher / Anna Kouba7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDana Weiland / Yuliya Barthes vs Carol Lekan / Jolyne Taylor0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Dana Weiland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Leigh Kimball
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
3.46
Kathryn Beth Beam
published
3.42
Jean Haas
published 3.5
3.35
Stephanie Rabby
published
3.35
Michelle Dickson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Nancy Baird
published
3.23
Averil Glover
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathleen Tsibulsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.97
Yuliya Barthes
published
2.93
Andrea Pfeiffer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Dickson + Dana Weiland3357% games+1.3% vs expected
Andrea Pfeiffer + Dana Weiland101046% games−14.2% vs expected
Michelle Dickson + Andrea Pfeiffer3549% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Kimball + Dana Weiland2647% gamesnot enough data
Averil Glover + Kathleen Tsibulsky2536% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Tsibulsky + Andrea Pfeiffer2534% gamesnot enough data
Averil Glover + Dana Weiland2346% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Dickson + Leigh Kimball224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dana Weiland
171W–127L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Leigh Kimball
57W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Monica Shea-Henderson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Kathryn Beth Beam
4W–14L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.46
3.5
Jean Haas
39W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.42
Stephanie Rabby
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Michelle Dickson
24W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.35
Nancy Baird
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Averil Glover
108W–92L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Kathleen Tsibulsky
53W–118L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.15
Yuliya Barthes
6W–20L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Andrea Pfeiffer
73W–146L career · 6 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.